Literature DB >> 20659929

Prediction of feather damage in laying hens using optical flows and Markov models.

Hyoung-joo Lee1, Stephen J Roberts, Kelly A Drake, Marian Stamp Dawkins.   

Abstract

Feather pecking in laying hens is a major welfare and production problem for commercial egg producers, resulting in mortality, loss of production as well as welfare issues for the damaged birds. Damaging outbreaks of feather pecking are currently impossible to control, despite a number of proposed interventions. However, the ability to predict feather damage in advance would be a valuable research tool for identifying which management or environmental factors could be the most effective interventions at different ages. This paper proposes a framework for forecasting the damage caused by injurious pecking based on automated image processing and statistical analysis. By frame-by-frame analysis of video recordings of laying hen flocks, optical flow measures are calculated as indicators of the movement of the birds. From the optical flow datasets, measures of disturbance are extracted using hidden Markov models. Based on these disturbance measures and age-related variables, the levels of feather damage in flocks in future weeks is predicted. Applying the proposed method to real-world datasets, it is shown that the disturbance measures offer improved predictive values for feather damage thus enabling an identification of flocks with probable prevalence of damage and injury later in lay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20659929      PMCID: PMC3061114          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  12 in total

1.  Dynamic models for nonstationary signal segmentation.

Authors:  W D Penny; S J Roberts
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1999-12

2.  Reducing feather pecking when raising laying hen chicks in aviary systems.

Authors:  B Huber-Eicher; F Sebö
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2001-07-02       Impact factor: 2.448

3.  Physiological and behavioural responses associated with feather removal in Gallus gallus var domesticus.

Authors:  M J Gentle; L N Hunter
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.534

4.  Variational Bayes for continuous hidden Markov models and its application to active learning.

Authors:  Shihao Ji; Balaji Krishnapuram; Lawrence Carin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Time course of plumage damage in commercial layers.

Authors:  A Bright
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Video-understanding framework for automatic behavior recognition.

Authors:  François Brémond; Monique Thonnat; Marcos Zúñiga
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-08

7.  An automatic system to study sperm motility and energetics.

Authors:  Linda Z Shi; Jaclyn M Nascimento; Charlie Chandsawangbhuwana; Elliot L Botvinick; Michael W Berns
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.838

8.  Infrared beak treatment method compared with conventional hot-blade trimming in laying hens.

Authors:  R L Dennis; A G Fahey; H W Cheng
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens.

Authors:  K A Drake; C A Donnelly; M Stamp Dawkins
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.095

10.  Causes of mortality in laying hens in different housing systems in 2001 to 2004.

Authors:  Oddvar Fossum; Désirée S Jansson; Pernille Engelsen Etterlin; Ivar Vågsholm
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 1.695

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Technology and Poultry Welfare.

Authors:  Neila Ben Sassi; Xavier Averós; Inma Estevez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Welfare Consequences of Omitting Beak Trimming in Barn Layers.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Lena K Hinrichsen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 3.  The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Virginie Michel; Jutta Berk; Nadya Bozakova; Jerine van der Eijk; Inma Estevez; Teodora Mircheva; Renata Relic; T Bas Rodenburg; Evangelia N Sossidou; Maryse Guinebretière
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Moving GIS research indoors: spatiotemporal analysis of agricultural animals.

Authors:  Courtney L Daigle; Debasmit Banerjee; Robert A Montgomery; Subir Biswas; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Monitoring chicken flock behaviour provides early warning of infection by human pathogen Campylobacter.

Authors:  Frances M Colles; Russell J Cain; Thomas Nickson; Adrian L Smith; Stephen J Roberts; Martin C J Maiden; Daniel Lunn; Marian Stamp Dawkins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Automated tracking to measure behavioural changes in pigs for health and welfare monitoring.

Authors:  Stephen G Matthews; Amy L Miller; Thomas PlÖtz; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prediction of welfare outcomes for broiler chickens using Bayesian regression on continuous optical flow data.

Authors:  Stephen J Roberts; Russell Cain; Marian Stamp Dawkins
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 4.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.