James S Lewis1, Eric Duncavage, Paul W Klonowski. 1. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. jlewis@path.wustl.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Published cases of oral high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) variably call the tumors Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) or small-cell/high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. We studied cases of cutaneous MCC and mucosal HGNEC to better distinguish them and to better define oral cases. STUDY DESIGN: Twelve cutaneous MCC and 14 mucosal HGNEC cases were identified. We reviewed the hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) morphology and performed immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin 20 (CK20), thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), p63, neurofilament (NF), and achaete-scute homolog 1 (MASH-1). We also performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). RESULTS: By morphology and immunohistochemistry, MCC and HGNEC showed many differences. CK20, NF, and TTF-1 stains were the most discriminatory. MASH-1 was expressed by both MCC and HGNEC. MCPyV was present in MCC and absent in all HGNEC. The 2 oral cavity mucosal carcinomas segregated into MCC and HGNEC types, the former having the H&E nuclear morphology and classic dot-like perinuclear CK20 staining typically associated with MCC. CONCLUSIONS: Oral cavity neuroendocrine carcinoma can be segregated into MCC and small-cell/HGNEC types by morphology and CK20 immunohistochemistry. MCPyV was present by PCR in cutaneous MCC but was not found in mucosal HGNEC. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: Published cases of oral high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) variably call the tumors Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) or small-cell/high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. We studied cases of cutaneous MCC and mucosal HGNEC to better distinguish them and to better define oral cases. STUDY DESIGN: Twelve cutaneous MCC and 14 mucosal HGNEC cases were identified. We reviewed the hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) morphology and performed immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin 20 (CK20), thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), p63, neurofilament (NF), and achaete-scute homolog 1 (MASH-1). We also performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). RESULTS: By morphology and immunohistochemistry, MCC and HGNEC showed many differences. CK20, NF, and TTF-1 stains were the most discriminatory. MASH-1 was expressed by both MCC and HGNEC. MCPyV was present in MCC and absent in all HGNEC. The 2 oral cavity mucosal carcinomas segregated into MCC and HGNEC types, the former having the H&E nuclear morphology and classic dot-like perinuclear CK20 staining typically associated with MCC. CONCLUSIONS: Oral cavity neuroendocrine carcinoma can be segregated into MCC and small-cell/HGNEC types by morphology and CK20 immunohistochemistry. MCPyV was present by PCR in cutaneous MCC but was not found in mucosal HGNEC. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Emil Chteinberg; Christopher Martin Sauer; Dorit Rennspiess; Lukas Beumers; Lisa Schiffelers; Jonathan Eben; Anke Haugg; Véronique Winnepenninckx; Anna Kordelia Kurz; Ernst-Jan Speel; Martin Zenke; Axel Zur Hausen Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 5.715