Literature DB >> 20658860

Operant variability and voluntary action.

Allen Neuringer1, Greg Jensen.   

Abstract

A behavior-based theory identified 2 characteristics of voluntary acts. The first, extensively explored in operant-conditioning experiments, is that voluntary responses produce the reinforcers that control them. This bidirectional relationship-in which reinforcer depends on response and response on reinforcer-demonstrates the functional nature of the voluntary act. The present article focuses on the second characteristic: a similar bidirectional relationship between reinforcement and the predictability/unpredictability of voluntary acts. Support for the theory comes from 2 areas of research. The first shows that levels of behavioral variability-from highly predictable to randomlike-are directly influenced by reinforcers. Put another way, variability is an operant dimension, analogous to response rate and force. The second source of support comes from psychophysical experiments in which human participants judged the degree to which "choices" by virtual actors on a computer screen appeared to be voluntary. The choices were intermittently reinforced according to concurrently operating schedules. The actors' behaviors appeared to most closely approximate voluntary human choices when response distributions matched reinforcer distributions (an indication of functionality) and when levels of variability, from repetitive to random, changed with reinforcement contingencies. Thus, voluntary acts are characterized by reinforcement-controlled functionality and unpredictability. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658860     DOI: 10.1037/a0019499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  13 in total

1.  Lack of reliability in the disruption of cognitive performance following exposure to protons.

Authors:  Bernard M Rabin; Nicholas A Heroux; Barbara Shukitt-Hale; Kirsty L Carrihill-Knoll; Zachary Beck; Chelsea Baxter
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Neurocognitive free will.

Authors:  Thomas T Hills
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Category learning in a transitive inference paradigm.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Tina Kao; Charlotte Michaelcheck; Saani Simms Borge; Vincent P Ferrera; Herbert S Terrace
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-09

4.  Unexpected downshifts in reward magnitude induce variation in human behavior.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Patricia D Stokes; Anthea Paterniti; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

Review 5.  Habits, action sequences and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Amir Dezfouli; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Monkeys would rather see and do: preference for agentic control in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Drew Altschul; Herbert Terrace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The Behavioral Neuroscience of Motivation: An Overview of Concepts, Measures, and Translational Applications.

Authors:  Eleanor H Simpson; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

8.  Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation.

Authors:  Robert Gaschler; Dieter Nattkemper
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-28

9.  Dysphoric Mood States are Related to Sensitivity to Temporal Changes in Contingency.

Authors:  Rachel M Msetfi; Robin A Murphy; Diana E Kornbrot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27

10.  What I Say is What I Get: Stronger Effects of Self-Generated vs. Cue-Induced Expectations in Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Maike Kemper; Valentin J Umbach; Sabine Schwager; Robert Gaschler; Peter A Frensch; Birgit Stürmer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.