Literature DB >> 20658840

When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity.

Abigail A Scholer1, Xi Zou, Kentaro Fujita, Steven J Stroessner, E Tory Higgins.   

Abstract

Four studies demonstrate the importance of self-regulatory mechanisms for understanding risk-seeking behavior under loss. Findings suggest that risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity under 3 conditions: (a) when an individual is in a state of loss; (b) when the individual is in a prevention-focused regulatory state (E. T. Higgins, 1997); and (c) when the risky option alone offers the possibility of eliminating loss. In situations involving loss, prevention motivation but not promotion motivation (whether measured or manipulated) was uniquely associated with behaviors that served the motivation to maintain the status quo. When the risky option offered the sole possibility of returning to the status quo, prevention motivation predicted increased risk seeking. However, when a more conservative option was available that also offered the possibility to return to the status quo, prevention motivation predicted risk aversion. When neither option offered the possibility to return to the status quo, prevention motivation was not associated with risky choice. The authors discuss the benefits of complementing existing accounts of risky decision making under loss with regulatory focus motivational mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658840     DOI: 10.1037/a0019715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  18 in total

Review 1.  Using neuroimaging to individualize TMS treatment for depression: Toward a new paradigm for imaging-guided intervention.

Authors:  Bruce M Luber; Simon Davis; Elisabeth Bernhardt; Andrada Neacsiu; Lori Kwapil; Sarah H Lisanby; Timothy J Strauman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Evidence for individual differences in regulatory focus in rats, Rattus norvegicus.

Authors:  Becca Franks; E Tory Higgins; Frances A Champagne
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  What Remains on Your Mind After You Are Done?: Flexible Regulation of Knowledge Accessibility.

Authors:  Per H Hedberg; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-09-01

4.  Eager feelings and vigilant reasons: Regulatory focus differences in judging moral wrongs.

Authors:  James F M Cornwell; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

Review 5.  Mind the gap: bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Tom Schonberg; Craig R Fox; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Microinterventions targeting regulatory focus and regulatory fit selectively reduce dysphoric and anxious mood.

Authors:  Timothy J Strauman; Yvonne Socolar; Lori Kwapil; James F M Cornwell; Becca Franks; Steen Sehnert; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2015-06-11

7.  Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui Mata; Anika K Josef; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Motivational consequences of counterfactual mindsets: Does counterfactual structure influence the use of conservative or risky tactics?

Authors:  Kevin Winter; Kai Epstude
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2022-09-10

9.  The elusive search for stable risk preferences.

Authors:  Craig R Fox; David Tannenbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-15

10.  State-trait interactions in regulatory focus determine impulse buying behavior.

Authors:  Anand Krishna; Sophia Ried; Marie Meixner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.