OBJECTIVE: Previous studies indicate that people respond defensively to threatening health information, especially when the information challenges self-relevant goals. The authors investigated whether reduced acceptance of self-relevant health risk information is already visible in early attention processes, that is, attention disengagement processes. DESIGN: In a randomized, controlled trial with 29 smoking and nonsmoking students, a variant of Posner's cueing task was used in combination with the high-temporal resolution method of event-related brain potentials (ERPs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reaction times and P300 ERP. RESULTS: Smokers showed lower P300 amplitudes in response to high- as opposed to low-threat invalid trials when moving their attention to a target in the opposite visual field, indicating more efficient attention disengagement processes. Furthermore, both smokers and nonsmokers showed increased P300 amplitudes in response to the presentation of high- as opposed to low-threat valid trials, indicating threat-induced attention-capturing processes. Reaction time measures did not support the ERP data, indicating that the ERP measure can be extremely informative to measure low-level attention biases in health communication. CONCLUSION: The findings provide the first neuroscientific support for the hypothesis that threatening health information causes more efficient disengagement among those for whom the health threat is self-relevant. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies indicate that people respond defensively to threatening health information, especially when the information challenges self-relevant goals. The authors investigated whether reduced acceptance of self-relevant health risk information is already visible in early attention processes, that is, attention disengagement processes. DESIGN: In a randomized, controlled trial with 29 smoking and nonsmoking students, a variant of Posner's cueing task was used in combination with the high-temporal resolution method of event-related brain potentials (ERPs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reaction times and P300 ERP. RESULTS: Smokers showed lower P300 amplitudes in response to high- as opposed to low-threat invalid trials when moving their attention to a target in the opposite visual field, indicating more efficient attention disengagement processes. Furthermore, both smokers and nonsmokers showed increased P300 amplitudes in response to the presentation of high- as opposed to low-threat valid trials, indicating threat-induced attention-capturing processes. Reaction time measures did not support the ERP data, indicating that the ERP measure can be extremely informative to measure low-level attention biases in health communication. CONCLUSION: The findings provide the first neuroscientific support for the hypothesis that threatening health information causes more efficient disengagement among those for whom the health threat is self-relevant. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
Authors: Christi A Patten; Kathryn R Koller; Christie A Flanagan; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Christine A Hughes; Abbie W Wolfe; Paul A Decker; Kristin Fruth; Tabetha A Brockman; Molly Korpela; Diana Gamez; Carrie Bronars; Neil J Murphy; Dorothy Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Timothy K Thomas Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-10-12
Authors: Seema Mutti-Packer; Jessica L Reid; James F Thrasher; Daniel Romer; Geoffrey T Fong; Prakash C Gupta; Mangesh S Pednekar; Nigar Nargis; David Hammond Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno Journal: Br J Health Psychol Date: 2013-10-01
Authors: Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter; Sonia Boyum; Vetta S Thompson; Charlene A Caburnay; Erika A Waters; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Suchitra Rath; Qiang Fu Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Susan D Brown; Omid Fotuhi; Christina S Grijalva; Ai-Lin Tsai; Charles P Quesenberry; Jenna L Ritchie; Geoffrey L Cohen; Assiamira Ferrara Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.983