Literature DB >> 20658555

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Ablate and wait versus rapid transplantation.

John P Roberts1, Alan Venook, Robert Kerlan, Francis Yao.   

Abstract

This opinion piece explores an "ablate and wait" strategy for improving the 5-year recurrence-free outcome of liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The Milan criteria delimit by tumor size and number a population of patients who have good survival after liver transplantation. The University of California San Francisco downstaging experience has shown that patients with a tumor burden outside the Milan criteria who undergo tumor ablation and a period of waiting have outcomes that rival those of patients who undergo transplantation within the Milan criteria because the tumor biology is allowed to become apparent by radiological studies during the waiting period. This experience has led to 2 conclusions: first, expansion beyond the Milan criteria should not occur without therapy directed to the tumor followed by a period of waiting to decrease the risk of recurrence, and second, for tumors within the Milan criteria, the same strategy should be considered. (c) 2010 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658555     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  40 in total

Review 1.  Loco-regional therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: Selecting an optimal therapy.

Authors:  Thomas J Byrne; Jorge Rakela
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

2.  Who should undergo liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma? Ablate, wait … and see!

Authors:  Willscott E Naugler; Barry Schlansky; Susan L Orloff
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20

Review 3.  Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma biological behavior in patient selection for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Umberto Cillo; Tommaso Giuliani; Marina Polacco; Luz Maria Herrero Manley; Gino Crivellari; Alessandro Vitale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  When to consider liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients?

Authors:  Ka Wing Ma; Tan To Cheung
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2017-07-06

Review 5.  Liver Allocation Policies in the USA: Past, Present, and the Future.

Authors:  Anjana Pillai; Thomas Couri; Michael Charlton
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Multimodality therapy and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 14-year prospective analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Rajesh Ramanathan; Amit Sharma; David D Lee; Martha Behnke; Karen Bornstein; R Todd Stravitz; Malcolm Sydnor; Ann Fulcher; Adrian Cotterell; Marc P Posner; Robert A Fisher
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Maurizio Pompili; Giampiero Francica; Francesca Romana Ponziani; Roberto Iezzi; Alfonso Wolfango Avolio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Identification of liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma and a very low dropout risk: implications for the current organ allocation policy.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Jennifer L Dodge; Aparna Goel; John Paul Roberts; Ryutaro Hirose; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Advances and Future Directions in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashil J Gosalia; Paul Martin; Patricia D Jones
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-07

Review 10.  Selection of patients of hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria for liver transplantation.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.