Literature DB >> 20658478

Three-sided hypothesis testing: simultaneous testing of superiority, equivalence and inferiority.

Jelle J Goeman1, Aldo Solari, Theo Stijnen.   

Abstract

We propose three-sided testing, a testing framework for simultaneous testing of inferiority, equivalence and superiority in clinical trials, controlling for multiple testing using the partitioning principle. Like the usual two-sided testing approach, this approach is completely symmetric in the two treatments compared. Still, because the hypotheses of inferiority and superiority are tested with one-sided tests, the proposed approach has more power than the two-sided approach to infer non-inferiority or non-superiority. Applied to the classical point null hypothesis of equivalence, the three-sided testing approach shows that it is sometimes possible to make an inference on the sign of the parameter of interest, even when the null hypothesis itself could not be rejected. Relationships with confidence intervals are explored, and the effectiveness of the three-sided testing approach is demonstrated in a number of recent clinical trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658478     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Large, Sparse Optimal Matching with Refined Covariate Balance in an Observational Study of the Health Outcomes Produced by New Surgeons.

Authors:  Samuel D Pimentel; Rachel R Kelz; Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 2.  Evidence-based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features.

Authors:  Alok Kumar Dwivedi; Rakesh Shukla
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-08-22

3.  Prognostic impact of diastolic dysfunction in systolic heart failure-A cross-project analysis from the German Competence Network Heart Failure.

Authors:  Claus Lüers; Frank Edelmann; Rolf Wachter; Burkert Pieske; Meinhard Mende; Christiane Angermann; Georg Ertl; Hans-Dirk Düngen; Stefan Störk
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Closed Testing in Pharmaceutical Research: Historical and Recent Developments.

Authors:  Kevin S S Henning; Peter H Westfall
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.452

5.  A Five-Region Hypothesis Test for Exposure-Disease Associations.

Authors:  Han-Yi Shih; Wen-Chung Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias.

Authors:  Harlan Campbell; Paul Gustafson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.