Literature DB >> 20658294

Ultrasound for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement of the cam type. Diagnostic performance of qualitative criteria and alpha angle measurements.

Florian M Buck1, Juerg Hodler, Marco Zanetti, Claudio Dora, Christian W A Pfirrmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess a technique to evaluate cam type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using ultrasound (US).
METHODS: Fifty patients (24 women, 26 men) were included (mean age: 39.1 years; age range: 16-59). US images of the anterior and anterosuperior contour of the femoral neck were obtained and analysed in 50 patients. Non-spherical shape of the head-neck junction (cam deformity), bony protuberances at the femoral neck, shape of the femoral neck (waist deficiency) and alpha angle were assessed. Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography served as the standard of reference. Diagnostic performance and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were calculated.
RESULTS: Based on MR arthrography 28 patients had cam-type FAI. On US, an anterosuperior cam deformity was seen in 40/44 patients (Reader 1/Reader 2; sensitivity 93%/89%, specificity 36%/14%). A bony protuberance anterosuperiorly in 23/13 patients (sensitivity 71%/32%, specificity 86%/82%) and an anterosuperior waist deficiency in 19/35 patients (sensitivity 25%/54%, specificity 100%/54%). Sensitivity and specificity of the other criteria were lower than 70% (average of Reader 1 & 2).
CONCLUSION: A technique to evaluate cam type FAI using US is presented. The detection of an anterosuperior cam deformity is sensitive, and presence of an anterosuperior bony protuberance is specific for cam FAI. Alpha angle measurements are not helpful in establishing the diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658294     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1900-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  35 in total

1.  Femoroacetabular impingement caused by a femoral osseous head-neck bump deformity: clinical, radiological, and experimental results.

Authors:  Marcus Jäger; Alexander Wild; Bettina Westhoff; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  Inter-observer agreement of ultrasonographic measurement of alpha and beta angles and the final type classification based on the Graf method.

Authors:  E A Simon; F Saur; M Buerge; R Glaab; M Roos; G Kohler
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  Range of motion in anterior femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  M Kubiak-Langer; Moritz Tannast; S B Murphy; K A Siebenrock; F Langlotz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Hip arthroscopy in the athletic patient: current techniques and spectrum of disease.

Authors:  Michael K Shindle; James E Voos; Benton E Heyworth; Douglas N Mintz; Luis E Moya; Robert L Buly; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated?

Authors:  Mohamed R Nouh; Mark E Schweitzer; Leon Rybak; Jodi Cohen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Osteoarthritis in other joints (hip, elbow, foot, ankle, toes, wrist) after sports injuries.

Authors:  Jason Koh; Jeffrey Dietz
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 8.  Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement.

Authors:  Michael Tanzer; Nicolas Noiseux
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  M Tannast; D Goricki; M Beck; S B Murphy; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome.

Authors:  Lisca Stähelin; Thomas Stähelin; Brigitte M Jolles; Richard F Herzog
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  7 in total

1.  A review of imaging modalities for the hip.

Authors:  Alexander E Weber; Jon A Jacobson; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

Review 2.  Femoro-acetabular impingement: what the general radiologist should know.

Authors:  Alberto Aliprandi; Francesco Di Pietto; Paolo Minafra; Marcello Zappia; Simona Pozza; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  What is the impingement-free range of motion of the asymptomatic hip in young adult males?

Authors:  Brian Larkin; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Denise Koueiter; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Age and sex-related distribution of alpha angles and the prevalence of the cam morphology of the hip in Asians do not differ from those of other ethnicities.

Authors:  Kee Hyung Rhyu; Young Soo Chun; Gwang Young Jung; Yoon Je Cho
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Ultrasound Can Determine Joint Distraction During Hip Arthroscopy but Fluoroscopic-Guided Portal Placement Is Superior.

Authors:  Nicholas A Trasolini; Lakshmanan Sivasundaram; Morgan W Rice; Safa Gursoy; Ian M Clapp; Thomas D Alter; Stéfano Gaggiotti; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 6.  Musculoskeletal ultrasonography of the lower extremities in infants and children.

Authors:  Michael J Callahan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-03-12

7.  Osteoarthritis: From Palliation to Prevention: AOA Critical Issues.

Authors:  Constance R Chu; Michael B Millis; Steven A Olson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.284

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.