| Literature DB >> 20658273 |
Johan Verjans1, Sander Wolters, Ward Laufer, Mark Schellings, Michelle Lax, Dagfinn Lovhaug, Hendrikus Boersma, Gerrit Kemerink, Simon Schalla, Paul Gordon, Jaap Teule, Jagat Narula, Leonard Hofstra.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The clinical feasibility of noninvasive imaging of interstitial alterations after myocardial infarction (MI) was assessed using a technetium-99m-labeled RGD imaging peptide (RIP). In experimental studies, RIP has been shown to target integrins associated with collagen-producing myofibroblasts (MFB). METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20658273 PMCID: PMC2990010 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9268-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Cardiol ISSN: 1071-3581 Impact factor: 5.952
Figure 1Schematic presentation of the clinical study protocol. Patients were enrolled during hospitalization for their first MI. All underwent myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) before discharge from hospital. All patients were brought back for 99mTc-RIP scintigraphy at 3 and 8 weeks after MI. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, 3 and 8 weeks, and 6 and 12 months
Angiographic profile, MPI, RIP imaging, ejection fraction, pro-BNP levels, and CMR parameters at baseline and follow-up
| No. | Coronary | MPI | 99mTc-RIP uptake | LVEF (%) | Pro-BNP (pmol/l) | CMR | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defect | Area 3 weeks | Area 8 weeks | ∆Area 3-8 weeks | ∆TC 3-8 weeks | Remote region | Baseline | ∆EF 0-12 M | Baseline | ∆pro-BNP 0-12 | LV mass (g) | Infarct size (%LV) | ||
| 1 | RCA prox | Large inferior wall | No uptake | No uptake | n/a | n/a | − | 47 | 0 | 171 | −145 | 76 | 21 |
| 2 | LAD D1 | Anterior and lateral-apical wall defects | Uptake antero-apical | Uptake antero-apical | = | − | − | 47 | −10 | 110 | −84 | 83 | 26 |
| 3 | LAD mid | Anterior-apical wall defect | Uptake antero-apical | Uptake antero-apical | + | + | − | 48 | 1 | 174 | −126 | 103 | 19 |
| 4 | LAD prox | Large anterio-apical and inferior wall defects | Uptake antero-apical and inferior walls | Uptake antero-apical and inferior walls; remote uptake | + | + | + | 33 | 7 | 200 | −155 | 109 | 30 |
| 5 | LAD prox | Large septal and anterio-apical wall defects | Focal areas of uptake corresponding to peri-infarct regions | Focal areas of uptake corresponding to peri-infarct regions; remote uptake | = | − | + | 51 | −3 | 215 | −189 | 89 | 36 |
| 6 | LAD prox + mid | Inferior wall and anterio-septal wall defects | Focal uptake in the anterior wall and apex | Focal uptake in the anterior wall and apex | = | + | − | 51 | 2 | 41 | −37 | 126 | 1 |
| 7 | RCA marg | Basal-lateral and basal-inferior wall defects | No uptake | No uptake | n/a | n/a | − | 66 | −3 | 11 | +1 | 68 | 9 |
| 8 | RCA mid | Large inferior defect | Little focal uptake | Little focal uptake | n/a | n/a | − | 45 | −4 | 110 | −82 | 134 | 16 |
| 9 | Cx | Large inferior wall defect | Little focal uptake | Little focal uptake | n/a | n/a | − | 59 | −20 | 172 | −148 | 113 | 27 |
| 10 | RCA | Small inferior and anterior wall defects | No uptake | No uptake | n/a | n/a | − | 56 | 3 | 31 | −18 | 130 | 7 |
No, Number; coronary, coronary artery involved; MPI, myocardial perfusion imaging; area, area of uptake; ∆TC, ∆total counts; LV, left ventricular; EF ejection fraction; CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (infarct size by delayed enhancement).
Clinical characteristics
| No. | Sex | Age | BMI | Symptoms | Artery | Intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 39 | 26.8 | VF | RCA prox | Primary PCI |
| 2 | F | 49 | 25.9 | AP | LAD D1 | Primary PCI |
| 3 | M | 72 | 23.8 | AP | LAD mid | Primary PCI |
| 4 | M | 55 | 22.8 | VF | LAD prox | Primary PCI |
| 5 | F | 63 | 27.5 | AP | LAD prox | Primary PCI |
| 6 | M | 59 | 32.7 | AP | LAD prox + mid | Primary PCI |
| 7 | F | 51 | 21.9 | AP | RCA marg | Primary PCI |
| 8 | M | 43 | 30.0 | AP | RCA mid | Primary PCI |
| 9 | M | 58 | 26 | AP | Cx prox | Primary PCI + Thrombolysis |
| 10 | M | 44 | 28 | AP | RCA mid | Primary PCI |
All culprit vessels demonstrated 99–100% occlusion except patient #6 (70–90%).
BMI, Body mass index; VF, ventricular fibrillation; AP, angina pectoris; prox, proximal; marg, marginal; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2Stress MPI at discharge and 99mTc-RIP imaging at 3 and 8 weeks post-MI in 3 patients. The left upper panel demonstrates the short axis (SA) and vertical long axis (VLA) views of perfusion defects delineated by myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the anterolateral region in patient #3 (red arrows). 99mTc-RIP images at 3 and 8 weeks (rows 2 and 3) show uptake (blue arrows) corresponding to the infarct and border zone delineated by MPI (red arrows). L denotes liver. The middle column shows patient #5 with a LAD region perfusion defect in MPI. 99mTc-RIP uptake in SA view extends beyond the infarct border zone at 3 and 8 weeks (red vs blue arrows). Patient #7 (right panel) is an example of a small RCA infarct (red arrows) with little or no 99mTc-RIP uptake at 3 and 8 weeks. The last row in all the panels represents fusion images of 3-week 99mTc-RIP and baseline MPI
Figure 3Co-localization of 3-week 99mTc-RIP uptake with CMR-verified evidence of fibrosis at 1 year. The first row demonstrates a CMR image of scar tissue in the LAD region (white arrows) in SA and VLA views for patients #3 and #5. The second row shows SA and VLA slices with 99mTc-RIP uptake (blue arrows) at 3 weeks after MI, corresponding to scar formation as determined by CMR after 1 year (blue vs white arrows). The last row shows SPECT/MR fusion images