Literature DB >> 20657874

The effect of miniscrew taper morphology on insertion and removal torque in dogs.

Jung-Yul Cha, Teruko Takano-Yamamoto, Chung-Ju Hwang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the insertion and removal torque of tapered and cylindric orthodontic miniscrews.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six miniscrews were placed into the buccal alveolar bone of the mandible in six male beagle dogs. Maximum insertion torque was measured during placement of 48 miniscrews, and the maximum removal torque was recorded after 3 and 12 weeks of loading. After 4 months of healing, 48 additional miniscrews were implanted in almost the same place as the first set of implants; insertion torque was again measured. Histologic analysis was performed after 3 and 12 weeks of loading. Bone-implant contact and bone volume/total volume were compared during each period and in each group.
RESULTS: The tapered miniscrews showed a higher mean maximum insertion torque (22.3 ± 3.2 Ncm) than the cylindric miniscrews (13.6 ± 2.0 Ncm) (P < .001). The mean maximum removal torque of the tapered miniscrews (9.1 ± 2.3 Ncm) was significantly higher than that of the cylindric miniscrews (5.7 ± 2.2 Ncm) at 3 weeks after placement (P < .05), but there was no significant difference in the mean maximum removal torque value between the tapered (4.2 ± 1.4 Ncm) and cylindric (3.0 ± 1.1 Ncm) implants after 12 weeks of loading. The percentage of bone-implant contact was similar between the groups after 3 weeks of loading and increased later. The percentage of bone volume/total volume was higher in the tapered miniscrews than in the cylindric miniscrews after 3 weeks of loading (P < .05), but there was no significant difference between the groups after 12 weeks of loading.
CONCLUSIONS: In this dog model, the tapered miniscrew design increased initial stability until 3 weeks of loading but had no additional effect on the secondary stability (ie, after 12 weeks of loading) versus a cylindric miniscrew design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20657874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Angled-predrilling depth and mini-implant shape effects on the mechanical properties of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants during the angled insertion procedure.

Authors:  Yoon-Young Heo; Keun-Chul Cho; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Stress distributions in peri-miniscrew areas from cylindrical and tapered miniscrews inserted at different angles.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Choi; Seong-Jin Kim; Kee-Joon Lee; Sang-Jin Sung; Youn-Sic Chun; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Effect of surface treatment on the mechanical stability of orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Thomali; Sakeenabi Basha; Roshan Noor Mohamed
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Factors influencing the removal torque of palatal implant used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Marc Andreas Schätzle; Monika Hersberger-Zurfluh; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Design characteristics, primary stability and risk of fracture of orthodontic mini-implants: pilot scan electron microscope and mechanical studies.

Authors:  André Walter; Heinz Winsauer; Jordi Marcé-Nogué; Sergi Mojal; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-09-01

6.  Effect of healing time on bone-implant contact of orthodontic micro-implants: a histologic study.

Authors:  Barat Ali Ramazanzadeh; Kazem Fatemi; Mahboobe Dehghani; Nooshin Mohtasham; Arezoo Jahanbin; Hamed Sadeghian
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2014-04-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.