Literature DB >> 20657852

A comparative study of bone densitometry during osseointegration: piezoelectric surgery versus rotary protocols.

Luca Di Alberti, Federica Donnini, Claudio Di Alberti, Michele Camerino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To date, there have been no studies on the outcome of osseointegration of alveolar bone around dental implants inserted with piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional osteotomy. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic differences, through evaluation of peri-implant bone density, between implant insertion using traditional surgical technique and piezoelectric technique. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Forty patients were selected whose treatment consisted of a minimum of two implants placed in nonpathologic native bone. A single type of implant surface (SLA) was chosen. The implants were placed following the manufacturer protocol for traditional surgical technique and piezoelectric technique. Radiographs were taken following surgery and 30, 60, and 90 days after surgery. The bone density was studied with the densitometry application. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: All patients completed the study period with success. Despite a limited number of treated patients, the results of this pilot study demonstrated that (1) piezoelectric implant site preparation promotes better bone density and osteogenesis, and (2) the piezoelectric technique is predictable, with a 100% success rate in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20657852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  6 in total

1.  Implant stability in different techniques of surgical sites preparation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Rastelli; G Falisi; R Gatto; M Galli; E Saccone; M Severino; C DI Paolo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

2.  Comparative efficacy of photo-activated disinfection and calcium hydroxide for disinfection of remaining carious dentin in deep cavities: a clinical study.

Authors:  Sidhartha Sharma; Ajay Logani; Naseem Shah
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-06-26

3.  Osseous outgrowth on the buccal maxilla associated with piezosurgery-assisted en-masse retraction: A case series.

Authors:  Nilüfer İrem Tunçer; Ayça Arman-Özçırpıcı; Bahar Füsun Oduncuoğlu; Alpdoğan Kantarcı
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  The effects of surgical preparation techniques and implant macro-geometry on primary stability: An in vitro study.

Authors:  G Falisi; M Severino; C Rastelli; S Bernardi; S Caruso; M Galli; L Lamazza; C Di Paolo
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 5.  Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Qian Jiang; Yating Qiu; Chi Yang; Jingyun Yang; Minjie Chen; Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures: a stability study in dogs.

Authors:  Jorge Cano; Julián Campo
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2012-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.