Literature DB >> 20657642

Identification of pathway-biased and deleterious melatonin receptor mutants in autism spectrum disorders and in the general population.

Pauline Chaste1, Nathalie Clement, Oriane Mercati, Jean-Luc Guillaume, Richard Delorme, Hany Goubran Botros, Cécile Pagan, Samuel Périvier, Isabelle Scheid, Gudrun Nygren, Henrik Anckarsäter, Maria Rastam, Ola Ståhlberg, Carina Gillberg, Emilie Serrano, Nathalie Lemière, Jean Marie Launay, Marie Christine Mouren-Simeoni, Marion Leboyer, Christopher Gillberg, Ralf Jockers, Thomas Bourgeron.   

Abstract

Melatonin is a powerful antioxidant and a synchronizer of many physiological processes. Alteration of the melatonin pathway has been reported in circadian disorders, diabetes and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, very little is known about the genetic variability of melatonin receptors in humans. Here, we sequenced the melatonin receptor MTNR1A and MTNR1B, genes coding for MT1 and MT2 receptors, respectively, in a large panel of 941 individuals including 295 patients with ASD, 362 controls and 284 individuals from different ethnic backgrounds. We also sequenced GPR50, coding for the orphan melatonin-related receptor GPR50 in patients and controls. We identified six non-synonymous mutations for MTNR1A and ten for MTNR1B. The majority of these variations altered receptor function. Particularly interesting mutants are MT1-I49N, which is devoid of any melatonin binding and cell surface expression, and MT1-G166E and MT1-I212T, which showed severely impaired cell surface expression. Of note, several mutants possessed pathway-selective signaling properties, some preferentially inhibiting the adenylyl cyclase pathway, others preferentially activating the MAPK pathway. The prevalence of these deleterious mutations in cases and controls indicates that they do not represent major risk factor for ASD (MTNR1A case 3.6% vs controls 4.4%; MTNR1B case 4.7% vs 3% controls). Concerning GPR50, we detected a significant association between ASD and two variations, Delta502-505 and T532A, in affected males, but it did not hold up after Bonferonni correction for multiple testing. Our results represent the first functional ascertainment of melatonin receptors in humans and constitute a basis for future structure-function studies and for interpreting genetic data on the melatonin pathway in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20657642      PMCID: PMC2904695          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Melatonin is synthesized in the pineal gland during the night and is involved in various physiologic functions, including sleep induction, circadian rhythm regulation, and immune response [1]. Melatonin synthesis requires serotonin, which is first acetylated by aryl alkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT) and then converted to melatonin by acetyl serotonin methyl transferase (ASMT also known as hydroxyindole O-methyltransferase or HIOMT) [1]. Melatonin signaling is mainly mediated by the guanine nucleotide binding (G) protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) MTNR1A (MT1) and MTNR1B (MT2) that are expressed in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) but are also present in other hypothalamic nuclei, retina, immune cells, and other peripheral organs. Established downstream cellular effects of melatonin receptor activation are inhibition of the adenylyl cyclase pathway and activation of the MAPK pathway [2]. The melatonin related receptor GPR50 is an orphan GPCR with no affinity for melatonin, but as a dimer with MT1, it inhibits melatonin signaling [3]. Abnormal melatonin signaling has been reported as a risk factor for medical conditions as diverse as diabetes mellitus, circadian rhythm and psychiatric disorders [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. The role of melatonin in the susceptibility to these disorders remains unclear, but an alteration of melatonin as a powerful antioxidant molecule and/or as a “Zeitgeber” (time giver) could alter and/or desynchronize many physiological processes related to a broad range of disorders. Sleep disorders are common in the general population, and their incidence is higher in many psychiatric disorders [9]. Abnormal sleep patterns have often been reported in patients with autism [10], [11], [12] or Asperger syndrome [13], [14], [15], a condition characterized by the presence of markedly autistic behavior in people of normal general intelligence. Several studies have indicated that melatonin treatment improves sleep in autism [16], [17], [18], [19], and in patients with Asperger syndrome [20]. The main effect on sleep seems to be a reduction of sleep onset latency. We therefore decided to study the genetic variability of the melatonin receptor MTNR1A and MTNR1B genes and the GPR50 gene in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) patients, in parallel to a normal European control population as well as in individuals of the human genome pluriethnic diversity panel (HGDP), by direct sequencing of the coding regions. Several non-synonymous mutants were identified for MT1 and MT2 and their functional properties determined in different in vitro assays.

Results

Identification of MTNR1A non-synonymous variants

Six non-synonymous mutations were identified for MTNR1A. The MT1-I49N variant was detected in a patient with ASD, but not in our control sample (Table 1). The patient carrying the mutation has high functioning autism and clinical delayed sleep phase syndrome (Table S1). Actimetry during three weeks showed a delayed sleep onset. Mean time of sleep onset was shifted with melatonin treatment from 0:52 AM to 11:36 PM. The mutation is inherited from the unaffected father.
Table 1

MTNR1A and MTNR1B variants identified in 295 patients with autism spectrum disorder, 362 controls, and 284 individuals from the human genome diversity panel.

VariationGenomic position a Allele Maj/MinNumber of individuals carrying the variation (Allelic frequency%)Receptor function
ASDControlsHDGP Panel
CaucasiansAsiansAfricans
(n = 295)(n = 362)(n = 89)(n = 107)(n = 88)
MTNR1A (Chr4)
I49N187476374T/A1 (0.17%)0000Altered
A157V187455426C/T0001 (0.47%)0ND
G166E187455399G/A6 (1%)15 (2%)2 (1.1%)01 (0.57%)Altered
I212T187455261T/C2 (0.33%)0006 (3.4%)Altered
A266V187455099C/T11 (1.9%)15 (2%)4 (2.2%)2 (0.93%)5 (2.8%)Altered
K334N187454894A/T1 (0.17%)2 (0.28%)1 (0.56%)00Altered
ALLb 20 (3.6%)30 (4.4%)7 (3.9%)3 (1.4%)12 (6.8%)
MTNR1B (chr11)
A13V92342577C/T0001 (0.47%)0ND
G24E92342610G/A4 AA 46 AG 245 GG f(A) 9.15%1 AA 48 AG 313 GG f(A) 6.9%3 AA 6 AG 80 GG f(A) 6.7%0 AA 8 AG 99 GG f(A) 3.7%0 AA 2 AG 86 GG f(A) 1.1%As control
A25T92342612G/A00001 (0.57%)ND
M120V92354397A/G01 (0.14%)000As control
V124I92354409G/A1 (0.17%)0000Altered
R138C92354449C/T1 (0.17%)2 (0.28%)000Altered
R231H92354729G/A3 (0.5%)5 (0.69%)1 (0.56%)00Altered
K243R92354765A/G0 GG 22 AG 273 AA f(G) 3.7%0 GG 15 AG 347 AA f(G) 2%0 GG 3 AG 86 AA f(G) 1.7%0 GG 1 AG 106 AA f(G)0.47%3 GG 28 AG 51 AA f(G)19.3%Altered
A325V92355011C/T0001 (0.47%)0ND
R330Q92355026G/A1 (0.17%)0000As control
ALLb 74(13.9%)67(10.1%)13 (8.9%)11 (5.1%)33 (21%)

Human genome build NCBI36/hg18;

total of individuals carrying MTNR1A/B variations. This number can be lower than the number of variants since some individuals are carrying two variations.

Human genome build NCBI36/hg18; total of individuals carrying MTNR1A/B variations. This number can be lower than the number of variants since some individuals are carrying two variations. The MT1-I212T variant was identified in two affected twins and another independent proband and not in controls. However these patients were all from African descent and this mutation was found in six individuals from African descent in the HGDP (Yoruba and Mandenka). In both families the probands received the mutation from their mother. The mother of the second family who carries the mutation has epilepsy. The three boys show severe mental retardation and severe autism without language. Sleep was not recorded as a major problem. The MT1-K334N variant was found in one proband, in two controls, and in one individual from the HDGP Caucasian sample (Basque). The proband carries also the relatively frequent MT1-A266V mutation (allelic frequency of 1–4% in the general population). Parent's DNA was not available to test whether these two mutations were on the same allele. He presents high functioning autism, without any remarkable medical history. The MT1-A157V variant was identified in one individual from the HGDP that originates from China (Miaozu). Two variants, MT1-G166E and MT1-A266V, were frequent and no significant difference was observed between patients and controls (p = 0.12 and p = 0.78)

Identification of MTNR1B non-synonymous variants

Ten non-synonymous mutations were identified for MTNR1B. The MT2-R138C variant was identified in one proband and in two controls (Table 1). The mother who transmitted the mutation was born from consanguineous parents and was homozygous at this locus (Table S1). She had no medical history except allergy. The proband presents severe autism without language. Sleep was not recorded as a major problem. The MT2-V124I variant was detected in one patient, but not in controls. Interestingly, the father of this proband, who also carried the mutation, was treated with bright light therapy for seasonal affective disorder as well as his brother from whom DNA was not available. Seasonal mood change was not evaluated for the proband because of mental retardation. The MT2-R231H variant was identified in a proband with Asperger syndrome without any comorbidity except strabism. DNA of first degree relatives wasn't available to test the segregation of the variation. The MT2-R330Q variant was identified in one of two affected brothers and his father. The proband, who carried the mutation, shows a more severe phenotype than his brother and exhibited sleep disorder during early childhood whereas his brother did not. The father has dyslexia. The MT2-M120V variant was identified only in one control. The MT2-A13V, MT2-A25T and MT2-A325V variants were identified in three independent individuals from the HGDP that originate from Asia (Pathan), Africa (San) and Asia (Cambodgian), respectively. One variant, MT2-G24E, was present in all populations with no significant difference in allelic frequency between patients and controls (p = 0.13). The MT2-K243R was significantly more frequent (19.3%) in individuals from African origin of the HDGP sample than in patients and controls (2.7%±1, p = 7.3 E-19)

Identification of GPR50 non-synonymous variants

Three GPR50 non-synonymous polymorphisms (S493R, T532A and I606V) and an in-frame 12 bp insertion/deletion polymorphism (Δ502–505), which results in the loss of four amino acids (Thr.Thr.Gly.His) were detected in ASD and controls (Table 2). A GPR50 R126H variation was identified in one male control (Table 2). In females, the frequency of each SNP was similar in patients with ASD and in controls. In males, a significant difference in allelic frequencies was observed for Δ502–505 (p = 0.04) and T532A (P = 0.02) between patients with ASD and controls. When individuals from non European descent are excluded, the association remained significant (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively).
Table 2

Variants of the X-linked GPR50 identified in 295 patients with ASD and 362 controls.

VariationAllele Maj/MinGenomic positiona(pb)ASDControls
(222 males and 73 females)(233 males and 129 females)
R126HG/AChr X: 150348431
MaleG/y 222 f(A) = 0%G/y 232 A/y 1; f(A) = 0.4%
FemaleG/G 73 f(A) = 0%G/G 129 f(A) = 0%
S493RG/AChr X: 150349533
MaleG/y 196 A/y 26; f(A) = 12%G/y 201 A/y 32; f(A) = 14%
FemaleG/G 137 A/G 9; f(A) = 6%G/G 110 A/G 19; f(A) = 7%
Δ502-505Ins/delChr X: 150349569
MaleIns/y 140 del/y 82; f(del) = 37%* Ins/y 125 del/y 108; f(del) = 46%
Femaleins/ins 21 del/ins 35 del/del 17; f(del) = 47%ins/ins 46 del/ins 60 del/del 23; f(del) = 41%
T532AA/GChr X: 150349649
MaleA/y 142 G/y 80; f(G) = 36%** A/y 123 G/y 110; f(G) = 47%
FemaleA/A 21 A/G 35 G/G 17; f(G) = 47%A/A 47 A/G 59 G/G 23; f(G) = 41%
V606IG/AChr X: 150349871
MaleG/y 122 A/y 100; f(A) = 45%G/y 119 A/y 114; f(A) = 49%
FemaleG/G 22 A/G 33 A/A 18; f(A) = 47%G/G 44 A/G 58 A/A 27; f(A) = 43%

*p = 0.04.

**p = 0.02;

Human genome build NCBI36/hg18.

*p = 0.04. **p = 0.02; Human genome build NCBI36/hg18.

Functional analysis of non-synonymous variants within the melatonin receptors

The functional properties of five MT1 and seven MT2 receptor mutants and their respective wild type counterparts were characterized in transiently and stably transfected HEK 293 and COS cells. The electrophoretic mobility of mutant receptors in SDS-PAGE experiments was indistinguishable from wild type receptors with a predominant band at 60 and 50 kDa for MT1 and MT2, respectively (Figure 1). No significant differences in the expression levels compared to wild type receptors were observed in three independent experiments. Immunofluorescence microscopy studies on intact cells revealed that MT1-I49N, MT1-G166E and MT1-I212T mutants have severely reduced cell surface expression. Experiments on permeabilized cells confirmed that these mutants were mainly located in intracellular membrane compartments (Figure 2A). All MT2 mutants were readily detectable at the cell surface (Figure 2B). Cell surface expression of some intracellularly retained GPCR mutants can be rescued in the presence of cell-permeable antagonists as shown for vasopressin V2 receptor mutants [21]. We therefore treated cells expressing MT1-I49N, MT1-G166E or MT1-I212T for 16 h with the cell permeable melatonin receptor antagonists 4-PPDOT or luzindole at 1 µM. None of these treatments significantly modified the surface expression of the mutant receptors (data not shown).
Figure 1

Detection of MT1 and MT2 mutants by SDS-PAGE.

Lysates from HEK 293 cells transiently expressing the indicated receptors were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysis performed by Western blot using anti-Flag or anti-MT1 (MT1) (A) or anti-Myc or anti-MT2 antibodies (MT2) (B). Similar results were obtained in three additional experiments.

Figure 2

A. Sub-cellular localization of MT1 mutants.

COS cells transiently expressing the indicated receptors were permeabilized or not with triton X-100 and total and surface exposed receptors detected by immunofluorescence microcopy with anti-Flag (MT1) antibodies. B. Sub-cellular localization of MT2 mutants. COS cells transiently expression the indicated receptors were permeabilized or not with triton X-100 and total and surface exposed receptors detected by immunofluorescence microcopy with anti-myc (MT2) antibodies. Similar results were obtained in three additional experiments.

Detection of MT1 and MT2 mutants by SDS-PAGE.

Lysates from HEK 293 cells transiently expressing the indicated receptors were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysis performed by Western blot using anti-Flag or anti-MT1 (MT1) (A) or anti-Myc or anti-MT2 antibodies (MT2) (B). Similar results were obtained in three additional experiments.

A. Sub-cellular localization of MT1 mutants.

COS cells transiently expressing the indicated receptors were permeabilized or not with triton X-100 and total and surface exposed receptors detected by immunofluorescence microcopy with anti-Flag (MT1) antibodies. B. Sub-cellular localization of MT2 mutants. COS cells transiently expression the indicated receptors were permeabilized or not with triton X-100 and total and surface exposed receptors detected by immunofluorescence microcopy with anti-myc (MT2) antibodies. Similar results were obtained in three additional experiments. Ligand binding properties were assessed in 2(125I)-iodomelatonin (125I-MLT) saturation and competition binding experiments (Table 3). All mutants did bind 125I-MLT and melatonin with high affinity with the exception of the MT1-I49N mutant, which was devoid of any binding activity. MT1-K334N, MT2-R138C, MT2-R231H and MT2-K243R showed significantly increased Kd values for 125I-MLT. However, this tendency was not confirmed at the level of Ki values for melatonin in competition binding experiments.
Table 3

Pharmacological characterization of MT1 and MT2 receptor mutants.

ReceptorKd (pM)Ki (pM)
MT1
Wt154+/−212800+/−690
I49R--
G166E220+/−202300+/−870
I212T101+/−52900+/−900
A266V224+/−431350+/−430
K334N395+/−68**3270+/−1700
MT2
Wt125+/−203230+/−627
G24E191+/−314090+/−1400
M120V194+/−564530+/−660
V124I165+/−176050+/−550
R138C234+/−25 *4700+/−245
R231H417+/−59 ***1850+/−820
K243R659+/−29 ***1780+/−850
R330Q90+/−204300+/−520

Kd values for 125I-MLT were determined in radioligand saturation experiments with increasing concentration of 125I-MLT. IC50 values for melatonin were determine in competition bindings experiments with 200 pM of 125I-MLT. Ki values were calculated from IC50 values using the Cheng-Prussof formula Ki = IC50/(1+[L]/Kd. Experiments were repeated 3–7 times (*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001 vs wt).

Kd values for 125I-MLT were determined in radioligand saturation experiments with increasing concentration of 125I-MLT. IC50 values for melatonin were determine in competition bindings experiments with 200 pM of 125I-MLT. Ki values were calculated from IC50 values using the Cheng-Prussof formula Ki = IC50/(1+[L]/Kd. Experiments were repeated 3–7 times (*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001 vs wt). Coupling of mutant receptors to Gi proteins was assessed in cAMP accumulation assays. Adenylyl cyclase was activated by forskolin and the inhibitory effect of melatonin receptor activation on this pathway monitored. Whereas wild type MT1 reduced forskolin-stimulated cAMP levels by 30%, MT1-I49N and MT1-I212T mutants were completely inactive and MT1-G166E and MT1-K334N were significantly less active compared to wild type receptors (Figure 3A, 3B). Most MT2 mutants were active in the cAMP assay with the exception of MT2-R138C and to a lesser extend the MT2-R231H and MT2-K243R mutants (Figure 4A). Melatonin-promoted activation of the ERK1/2 pathway was used as a second read-out to determine the signaling properties of melatonin receptor mutants. Wild type and mutant receptors showed the expected transient increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation with a 3 and 2.5 fold maximal increase for MT1 and MT2, respectively (Figure 3C, 4C). As in the cAMP assay, the MT1-I49N mutant was completely inactive in the ERK1/2 assay (Figure 3C). Interestingly, MT1-G166E and MT1-I212T mutants, which were completely inactive in the cAMP assay, were clearly active, although only partially, in the ERK1/2 assay. In addition, the MT1-A266V mutant showed a partially impaired ability to activate this pathway. ERK1/2 activation by MT2-G24E and MT2-R330Q was similar to the MT2 wild type and in agreement with the corresponding signaling properties for the cAMP pathway (Figure 4C). All other mutants showed reduced activity towards ERK1/2 activation. Whereas MT2-R138C was inactive in the ERK1/2 assay and the cAMP assay, the MT2-V124I mutant was inactive in the ERK1/2 assay but fully active in the cAMP assay (Figure 4B) indicating that the latter mutant is biased towards the cAMP pathway. Taken together, by analyzing a set of previously unknown melatonin receptor mutants, several mutants with modified functional properties were identified.
Figure 3

Signaling of MT1 mutants through the cAMP and ERK pathways.

HEK 293 cells were transiently (A, B) or stably (C–F) transfected with the indicated receptors. Inhibition of the cAMP pathway was measured by stimulating cells with forskolin alone (10 µM) or with forskolin and (A) 10 nM or (C) increasing concentration of melatonin for 60 min. Cyclic AMP levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. ERK activation was measured by incubating cells with 100 nM melatonin for the indicated times (C–F). Phospho-ERK and ERK levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments each performed in duplicate (*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001 vs wt).

Figure 4

Signaling of MT2 mutants through the cAMP and ERK pathways.

HEK 293 cells were transiently (A, B) or stably (C–E) transfected with the indicated receptors. Inhibition of the cAMP pathway was measured by stimulating cells with forskolin alone (10 µM) or with forskolin and (A) 10 nM or (C) increasing concentration of melatonin for 60 min. Cyclic AMP levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. ERK activation was measured by incubating cells with 100 nM melatonin for the indicated times (C–E). Phospho-ERK and ERK levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments each performed in duplicate (*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001 vs wt).

Signaling of MT1 mutants through the cAMP and ERK pathways.

HEK 293 cells were transiently (A, B) or stably (C–F) transfected with the indicated receptors. Inhibition of the cAMP pathway was measured by stimulating cells with forskolin alone (10 µM) or with forskolin and (A) 10 nM or (C) increasing concentration of melatonin for 60 min. Cyclic AMP levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. ERK activation was measured by incubating cells with 100 nM melatonin for the indicated times (C–F). Phospho-ERK and ERK levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments each performed in duplicate (*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001 vs wt).

Signaling of MT2 mutants through the cAMP and ERK pathways.

HEK 293 cells were transiently (A, B) or stably (C–E) transfected with the indicated receptors. Inhibition of the cAMP pathway was measured by stimulating cells with forskolin alone (10 µM) or with forskolin and (A) 10 nM or (C) increasing concentration of melatonin for 60 min. Cyclic AMP levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. ERK activation was measured by incubating cells with 100 nM melatonin for the indicated times (C–E). Phospho-ERK and ERK levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments each performed in duplicate (*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001 vs wt).

Discussion

We identified several mutants altering the functional properties of the human melatonin receptors. The MT1-I49N mutant showed the strongest phenotype as it was completely devoid of any melatonin binding and signaling capacity and did not express at the cell surface. The location of the mutation in the transmembrane domain 1 (TM1) indicates a previously unknown role of this domain in ligand binding of the MT1 receptor (Figure 5A). Severely impaired cell surface expression was also observed for MT1-G166E and MT1-I212T mutants. Treatment of these receptor mutants with cell permeable antagonists did not rescue cell surface expression indicating that conformational stabilization of these mutants is unable to overcome the export defect as has been shown previously for mutants of the vasopressin V2 receptor [21].
Figure 5

Topology of MT1 and MT2 receptors.

The amino acid sequence of MT1 (A) and MT2 (B) receptors are shown and amino acids identified in receptor variants are highlighted in black (ℓ). Amino acids known to be involved in 125I-MLT binding are circled in black. The NRY motif is highlighted in grey (C-ter, carboxyl terminal domain; e1, e2, e3, extracellular loops 1–3; i1, i2, i3, intracellular loops 1–3; N-ter, amino terminal domain).

Topology of MT1 and MT2 receptors.

The amino acid sequence of MT1 (A) and MT2 (B) receptors are shown and amino acids identified in receptor variants are highlighted in black (ℓ). Amino acids known to be involved in 125I-MLT binding are circled in black. The NRY motif is highlighted in grey (C-ter, carboxyl terminal domain; e1, e2, e3, extracellular loops 1–3; i1, i2, i3, intracellular loops 1–3; N-ter, amino terminal domain). The R138C mutation of MT2 is located in the NRY segment, equivalent to the DRY motif that is conserved among all GPCRs [22] (Figure 5B). This motif is believed to be important for the activation mechanism of GPCRs and mutation of the central arginine residue has been shown to result in constitutively active receptors that are continually internalized and desensitized, explaining their impaired signaling properties [22]. In the case of the MT2-R138C mutant, no constitutive activity or internalization was observed but rather an impaired capacity to regulate the adenylyl cyclase pathway despite intact ligand binding properties. Interestingly, mutation of the central arginine residue was also detected for GPR50 in the R126H mutant suggesting that this orphan receptor might have some constitutive activity that is modified in this mutant. For MT1-G166E and MT1-I212T, the mutations are located in the second extracellular loop (e2) and at the junction between TM5 and the third intracellular loop (i3), respectively. Interestingly, despite reduced cell surface expression and impaired signaling through the cAMP pathway, these two mutants retained some partial activity towards the ERK1/2 pathway. The phenotype of these mutants is new and was completely unpredictable. The e2 loop is increasingly recognized to play an important role in ligand binding or gating of ligands to the ligand binding pocket of GPCRs in the TM region [23], [24]. The N-terminal part of the i3 has been shown to be important for G protein binding for several other receptors. Interestingly, whereas the MT1-G166E and MT1-I212T mutants appear to be biased towards the ERK1/2 pathway, the MT2-V124I mutant (mutation located in TM3) appears to be biased towards the cAMP pathway, as this mutant fully activates the cAMP pathway, but only partially the ERK1/2 pathway. The spatial proximity of this mutant with the conserved NRY motif at the end of TM3 might be important for the phenotype of the MT2-V124I mutant. Taken together, we describe here the first melatonin receptor mutants that show various functional defects ranging from the absence of ligand binding to impaired pathway-selective signaling properties. Considering all populations, non-synonymous mutations were less frequently observed in MTNR1A (4%±1.9) compared to MTNR1B (11.8%±6). All MTNR1A variations were shown to affect slightly or dramatically the function of the receptor whereas for MTNR1B, 4 out of 7 variations were deleterious. When all mutations were considered, only a significant increase of MTNR1B non-synonymous mutations was observed in ASD compared to controls (MTNR1A ASD: 3.6% vs controls: 4.4% Fisher exact test P = 0.48; MTNR1B ASD: 13.9% vs controls: 10.1%; P = 0.038). However, this association was no longer significant when only MTNR1B mutations with deleterious effects were included in the analysis (ASD: 4.7% vs controls 3%; P = 0.11). Indeed, the relatively frequent variation G24E and the rare variation M120V seem to have no effect on the function of MT2. In contrast, MT2-K243R significantly affects the Kd of the melatonin receptor and was observed in 19.3% of individuals from sub-Saharan African descent. This is contrasting with Europe and Asia, where the MT2-K243R variation was observed with an allelic frequency of less than 4%. Considering that MTNR1B is a susceptibility gene for diabetes, this result suggests that this deleterious MT2 variation could represent a risk factor for diabetes in sub Saharan African populations. Finally, a significant association between ASD and two GPR50 variations Δ502–505 and T532A was detected in affected males, but it did not hold up after Bonferonni correction for multiple testing. Since GPR50 influences neurite outgrowth [25] and the Δ502–505 variant was previously associated with bipolar disorder in females [26], a possible association of this gene with ASD warrants further genetic and functional studies. Our results indicate that non-synonymous mutations within the melatonin receptors do not represent a major risk factor for ASD. These results therefore suggest that the melatonin signaling is efficient in the majority of the patients with ASD, a feature consistent with the great efficacy of melatonin treatment for sleep disorders in patients suffering from these disorders [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Nevertheless, in a subgroup of patients, the presence of a deleterious mutation may have phenotypic consequences. The proband carrying the deleterious MT1-I49N mutation exhibited a delayed sleep onset confirmed with actimetry. The father carrier of the deleterious MT1-V124I mutation was treated for seasonal affective disorder with bright light therapy. Interestingly, MT1-V124I was recently identified in 1/109 patients with ASD and 0/188 controls from Sweden [27]. In summary, human disorders caused or influenced by abnormal clock setting remain to be characterized. Given the importance of sleep for health, the exploration of the causes of abnormal melatonin signaling is warranted for clinicians to provide adequate combination therapy. Taken together, we present here the first comprehensive study evaluating the genetic variability of the melatonin receptor MTNR1A and MTNR1B genes in the general population and in ADS patients. Although no clear association could be identified between melatonin receptor variants and our ASD cohort, these mutants will be very useful for future studies not only on ASD patients but also on type 2 diabetes patients, for whom an association of an intronic SNP in the MTNR1B gene has been shown recently [4], [5]. The functional characterization of the mutants identified in the present study will provide new insights in the structure-function relationship of MT1 and MT2 receptors and can now be extended towards tissues expressing melatonin receptor endogenously. The pathway-biased signaling of several mutants in respect to the cAMP and MAPK pathway is of particular interest demonstrating that melatonin receptors possess the intrinsic property to reach pathway-selective conformational states and opening the possibility that the phenotype of some patients is associated with signaling pathway-specific effects.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) and written inform consents were obtained for all participants of the study. The local IRB are Comités de Protection des Personnes Île-de-France VI Sis Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière 75013 PARIS for France and the Sahlgrenska Academy Ethics committee, University of Gothenburg for Sweden. For all probands (245 children and 50 adults), written inform consent was signed by the patients or parents or the legal representative.

Subjects

Families with ASD were recruited by the Paris Autism Research International Sibpair study at specialized clinical centers in seven countries (France, Sweden, Norway, Italy, Belgium, Austria and the United States). Diagnosis was based on clinical evaluation by experienced clinicians, DSM-IV criteria, and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) [28]. In Sweden, the Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders (DISCO-10) [29] was used instead of the ADI-R in some cases. Patients with Asperger syndrome were evaluated with the Asperger Syndrome Diagnostic Interview [30]. The study sample (n = 295, 222 males and 73 females) included 222 patients with autistic disorder and 61 with Asperger syndrome; 12 individuals narrowly missed the criteria for autistic disorder and were considered to have pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). They were unrelated patients. When a rare variation was identified, the segregation was studied in first degree relatives. There were 274 Caucasians, 5 sub-Saharian Africans, 3 Asians, and 13 families of mixed ethnicity. The control sample (n = 362) comprised 100 French (60 males, 40 females) and 262 Swedish individuals (173 males, 89 females) all of European descent. In addition, a sample of 284 individuals from the human genome diversity panel (HGDP) [31] was screened for rare variants of MTNR1A and MTNR1B. The sample included 107 individuals from Asia, 88 from sub-Saharian Africa and 89 from Europe (Table S2).

Genetic screening of the melatonin receptors

Blood samples were collected and DNA was extracted by the phenol/chloroform method. Mutation screening was performed by direct sequencing of the PCR products. All PCRs were performed with Qiagen HotStar Taq kit. Two PCR protocols were used: (i) Standard protocol: 95°C for 15 min, followed by 35 cycles at 99°C for 30 s, 55 to 65°C for 20 s, 72°C for 60 to 90 s, with a final cycle at 72°C for 10 min; and (ii) Touchdown protocol: 95°C for 15 min followed by 20 cycles at 99°C for 30 s, 60–50°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, followed by 20 cycles at 99°C for 30 s, 50° for 10 s, and 72°C for 1 minute, with a final cycle at 72°C for 10 min. For primers and PCR conditions, (see table S3). PCR products were sequenced with the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (V3.1, Applied Biosystems). Samples were then subjected to electrophoresis, using an ABI PRISM genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Each PCR product was sequenced using both forward and reverse primers. When a non-synonymous mutation was identified, PCR and sequenced were performed again from a new batch of DNA.

Functional screening of the melatonin receptors

The immunofluorescence experiments and immunoblots of the MTNR1A (MT1) and MTNR1B (MT2) variants were performed using COSM1 cells transfected with each plasmid and seeded the day after onto sterile 25 mm polyL-lysine-coated coverslips. After 24 h, cells were fixed with PBS-PFA 4% for 15 min. After a 10 min permeabilization step in PBS-Triton X-100 0.1%, cells were blocked for 1 h with 3% BSA in PBS. Cells were immunolabeled for 1 h incubation with primary antibodies: monoclonal anti-Flag at 2 µg/ml (Sigma, MO) or monoclonal anti-myc 0.2 µg/ml (Santa Cruz, CA), followed by 20 min with the secondary antibody FITC anti-mouse. For immunoblots, crude membrane preparations were performed as described previously [32]. Proteins were loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman). After blocking with 5% non fat dried milk, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies: rabbit anti-MT1, rabbit anti-MT2, mouse anti-p-ERK1/2 (Santa Cruz). Immunoreactivity was revealed using IRDye infrared secondary antibodies using the LI-COR Odyssey infrared imaging system (Courtaboeuf, France). The cellular localization of melatonin receptors was assessed on COS cells transfected with the different Flag-tagged MT1 mutants or Myc-tagged MT2 mutants fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS on ice for 20 min, in the presence or not of 0.1% Triton X-100. After several PBS washes, cells were incubated in PBS containing 2% BSA for 1 h then in the same buffer containing anti-Flag M2 or anti-Myc 9E10 antibodies (1 h on ice). Cells were then incubated with Cyanin3-coupled secondary antibody. The fluorescence was measured by FACS. Binding experiments were performed on crude membrane preparation and 2(125I)-iodomelatonin (125I-MLT) (PerkinElmer) radioligand as described previously [32]. Competition binding assays were carried out on crude membranes at 200 pM 125I-MLT and increasing concentrations of melatonin. (Sigma, St Louis, MO) as described previously [33]. The cAMP-Gi activation was determined by measuring cyclic AMP levels by HTRF using the “cAMP femto2” kit (Cisbio, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France). Cells in suspension were stimulated by 10 µM forskolin, alone or in the presence of 10 nM melatonin for 30 min. Samples were analyzed with a Pherastar apparatus (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). For the MAP-kinase activation, cells were stimulated with 10 nM melatonin and the kinetics of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was determined by immunoblotting. Phosphorylated ERK1/2 were detected by anti-phospho-ERK antibody (sc-7383, Santa-Cruz). Levels of loaded proteins were compared by detection of ERK2 (sc-154, Santa-Cruz).

Actimetry

Actimetry was measured for the proband with the MT1-I49N mutation with an Actiwatch bracelet. Results were analyzed with Actiwatch Activity and Sleep Analysis (5.24 version). Clinical observations of the families carrying rare MTNR1A and MTTNR1B mutations. (0.06 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file. Populations from the Human Genome Diversity Panel used in this study. (0.14 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file. Primers and PCR conditions (0.04 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  33 in total

1.  A human genome diversity cell line panel.

Authors:  Howard M Cann; Claudia de Toma; Lucien Cazes; Marie-Fernande Legrand; Valerie Morel; Laurence Piouffre; Julia Bodmer; Walter F Bodmer; Batsheva Bonne-Tamir; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Zhu Chen; J Chu; Carlo Carcassi; Licinio Contu; Ruofu Du; Laurent Excoffier; G B Ferrara; Jonathan S Friedlaender; Helena Groot; David Gurwitz; Trefor Jenkins; Rene J Herrera; Xiaoyi Huang; Judith Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Andre Langaney; Alice A Lin; S Qasim Mehdi; Peter Parham; Alberto Piazza; Maria Pia Pistillo; Yaping Qian; Qunfang Shu; Jiujin Xu; S Zhu; James L Weber; Henry T Greely; Marcus W Feldman; Gilles Thomas; Jean Dausset; L Luca Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sleep in young adults with Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Pekka Tani; Nina Lindberg; Taina Nieminen-von Wendt; Lennart von Wendt; Jussi Virkkala; Björn Appelberg; Tarja Porkka-Heiskanen
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.328

3.  Mutation screening of melatonin-related genes in patients with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Lina Jonsson; Elin Ljunggren; Anna Bremer; Christin Pedersen; Mikael Landén; Kent Thuresson; Maibritt Giacobini; Jonas Melke
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.063

4.  Pharmacological chaperones rescue cell-surface expression and function of misfolded V2 vasopressin receptor mutants.

Authors:  J P Morello; A Salahpour; A Laperrière; V Bernier; M F Arthus; M Lonergan; U Petäjä-Repo; S Angers; D Morin; D G Bichet; M Bouvier
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Importance and relevance of melatonin to human biological rhythms.

Authors:  J Arendt
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.627

6.  The Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders: background, inter-rater reliability and clinical use.

Authors:  Lorna Wing; Susan R Leekam; Sarah J Libby; Judith Gould; Michael Larcombe
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Monitoring of ligand-independent dimerization and ligand-induced conformational changes of melatonin receptors in living cells by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Mohammed A Ayoub; Cyril Couturier; Estelle Lucas-Meunier; Stephane Angers; Philippe Fossier; Michel Bouvier; Ralf Jockers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Generation of the melatonin endocrine message in mammals: a review of the complex regulation of melatonin synthesis by norepinephrine, peptides, and other pineal transmitters.

Authors:  Valerie Simonneaux; Christophe Ribelayga
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 25.468

9.  Sleep patterns and sleep disorders in children with autistic spectrum disorders: insights using parent report and actigraphy.

Authors:  Luci Wiggs; Gregory Stores
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.449

10.  Effectiveness of melatonin in the treatment of sleep disturbances in children with Asperger disorder.

Authors:  E Juulia Paavonen; Taina Nieminen-von Wendt; Raija Vanhala; Eeva T Aronen; Lennart von Wendt
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.576

View more
  27 in total

1.  Targeting pancreatic progenitor cells in human embryonic stem cell differentiation for the identification of novel cell surface markers.

Authors:  Bettina Fishman; Hanna Segev; Oded Kopper; Jonathan Nissenbaum; Margarita Schulman; Nissim Benvenisty; Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor; Danny Kitsberg
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  Melatonin receptors: molecular pharmacology and signalling in the context of system bias.

Authors:  Erika Cecon; Atsuro Oishi; Ralf Jockers
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Genome-wide association study of copy number variations (CNVs) with opioid dependence.

Authors:  Dawei Li; Hongyu Zhao; Henry R Kranzler; Ming D Li; Kevin P Jensen; Tetyana Zayats; Lindsay A Farrer; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Sleep in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Margaret C Souders; Stefanie Zavodny; Whitney Eriksen; Rebecca Sinko; James Connell; Connor Kerns; Roseann Schaaf; Jennifer Pinto-Martin
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  Update on melatonin receptors: IUPHAR Review 20.

Authors:  Ralf Jockers; Philippe Delagrange; Margarita L Dubocovich; Regina P Markus; Nicolas Renault; Gianluca Tosini; Erika Cecon; Darius P Zlotos
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  The medical care of children with autism.

Authors:  Hilde Olivié
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Melatonin pathway genes and breast cancer risk among Chinese women.

Authors:  Sandra L Deming; Wei Lu; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Ying Zheng; Qiuyin Cai; Jirong Long; Xiao Ou Shu; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  A Review of Melatonin, Its Receptors and Drugs.

Authors:  Mucahit Emet; Halil Ozcan; Lutfu Ozel; Muhammed Yayla; Zekai Halici; Ahmet Hacimuftuoglu
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-06

9.  Valproic Acid Influences MTNR1A Intracellular Trafficking and Signaling in a β-Arrestin 2-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Ling-Juan Hong; Quan Jiang; Sen Long; Huan Wang; Ling-di Zhang; Yun Tian; Cheng-Kun Wang; Jing-Jing Cao; Rong-Rong Tao; Ji-Yun Huang; Mei-Hua Liao; Ying-Mei Lu; Kohji Fukunaga; Nai-Ming Zhou; Feng Han
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 10.  Melatonin: an underappreciated player in retinal physiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Gianluca Tosini; Kenkichi Baba; Christopher K Hwang; P Michael Iuvone
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.