Lewis A Eisen1, Sharon Leung, Annemarie E Gallagher, Vladimir Kvetan. 1. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Jay B. Langner Critical Care Service, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. leisen@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonography is an effective tool for making quick diagnoses and guiding therapeutic procedures. National organizations have advocated increasing the use of critical care ultrasonography. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of teaching of critical care ultrasonography in fellowship programs. In addition, we hoped to identify barriers to establishment of ultrasound training programs. DESIGN: All pulmonary/critical care and critical care medicine (CCM) program directors in the United States were invited to participate in an online survey. We asked respondents for demographic information about their programs and perceived barriers to training, as well as current training opportunities for their fellows in five aspects of critical care ultrasonography. A five-point Likert scale was used for survey answers. SETTING: Web-based survey. SUBJECTS: Pulmonary/critical care and CCM program directors in the United States. INTERVENTIONS: Web-based survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety (66%) of 136 program directors responded. Ultrasonography training was offered by fellowship programs in the following areas: vascular access (98%), lung and pleural (74%), cardiac (55%), vascular diagnostic (33%), and abdominal (37%). Ninety-two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that ultrasound training is useful, and 80% were interested in getting their fellows trained. Forty-one percent indicated that they lacked sufficient faculty trained in ultrasound use. Eighty-four percent agreed or strongly agreed that fellow turnover was an impediment to training. Forty-eight percent believed that cardiac echocardiography required a long training time. CONCLUSIONS: Although ultrasound training in vascular access was nearly universal, training in other aspects of ultrasound was less prevalent. We identified several barriers, including fellow turnover, insufficient faculty training, and perceived length of time required for echocardiography training.
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonography is an effective tool for making quick diagnoses and guiding therapeutic procedures. National organizations have advocated increasing the use of critical care ultrasonography. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of teaching of critical care ultrasonography in fellowship programs. In addition, we hoped to identify barriers to establishment of ultrasound training programs. DESIGN: All pulmonary/critical care and critical care medicine (CCM) program directors in the United States were invited to participate in an online survey. We asked respondents for demographic information about their programs and perceived barriers to training, as well as current training opportunities for their fellows in five aspects of critical care ultrasonography. A five-point Likert scale was used for survey answers. SETTING: Web-based survey. SUBJECTS: Pulmonary/critical care and CCM program directors in the United States. INTERVENTIONS: Web-based survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety (66%) of 136 program directors responded. Ultrasonography training was offered by fellowship programs in the following areas: vascular access (98%), lung and pleural (74%), cardiac (55%), vascular diagnostic (33%), and abdominal (37%). Ninety-two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that ultrasound training is useful, and 80% were interested in getting their fellows trained. Forty-one percent indicated that they lacked sufficient faculty trained in ultrasound use. Eighty-four percent agreed or strongly agreed that fellow turnover was an impediment to training. Forty-eight percent believed that cardiac echocardiography required a long training time. CONCLUSIONS: Although ultrasound training in vascular access was nearly universal, training in other aspects of ultrasound was less prevalent. We identified several barriers, including fellow turnover, insufficient faculty training, and perceived length of time required for echocardiography training.
Authors: Paru Patrawalla; Lewis Ari Eisen; Ariel Shiloh; Brijen J Shah; Oleksandr Savenkov; Wendy Wise; Laura Evans; Paul Mayo; Demian Szyld Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2015-12
Authors: Enyo A Ablordeppey; Anne M Drewry; Daniel L Theodoro; LinLin Tian; Brian M Fuller; Richard T Griffey Journal: Shock Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Joel Cho; Trevor P Jensen; Kreegan Reierson; Benji K Mathews; Anjali Bhagra; Ricardo Franco-Sadud; Loretta Grikis; Michael Mader; Ria Dancel; Brian P Lucas; Nilam J Soni Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Vi Am Dinh; Paresh C Giri; Inimai Rathinavel; Emilie Nguyen; David Hecht; Ihab Dorotta; H Bryant Nguyen; Ara A Chrissian Journal: Crit Care Res Pract Date: 2015-08-05