OBJECTIVE: Comparison of 2-dimensional and semiautomated 3-dimensional (3D) measurements to distinguish between benign and malignant lymph nodes in patients with malignant lymphoma. METHODS: Whole-body positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed in 33 patients before therapy for malignant lymphoma. Two hundred fifty-seven peripheral lymph nodes (mean size, 13.4 +/- 5.4 mm) were evaluated independently by 2 radiologists, both manually and with the use of semiautomated segmentation software. Long-axis diameter (LAD), short-axis diameter (SAD), maximal 3D diameter, volume, and elongation were measured. Positron emission tomography-CT and PET-CT follow-up and/or histology served as the reference standard. Statistical analysis encompassed intraclass correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The standard of reference revealed involvement in 116 (45%) of 257 lymph nodes. Manual and semiautomated LAD and SAD showed good correlation with intraclass coefficients of 0.85 and 0.72, respectively. Semiautomated prediction of malignant lymph nodes revealed the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for volume (0.760; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.639-0.887) followed by SAD (0.740; 95% CI, 0.616-0.862). The findings for LAD (0.722; 95% CI, 0.588-0.855), maximal 3D diameter (0.697; 95% CI, 0.565-0.830), and lymph node elongation (0.605; 95% CI, 0.466-0.745) were significantly lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric lymph node analysis is significantly superior compared with established LAD in the prediction of lymph node involvement and therefore can add to the definition of peripheral lymphoma target lesions.
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of 2-dimensional and semiautomated 3-dimensional (3D) measurements to distinguish between benign and malignant lymph nodes in patients with malignant lymphoma. METHODS: Whole-body positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed in 33 patients before therapy for malignant lymphoma. Two hundred fifty-seven peripheral lymph nodes (mean size, 13.4 +/- 5.4 mm) were evaluated independently by 2 radiologists, both manually and with the use of semiautomated segmentation software. Long-axis diameter (LAD), short-axis diameter (SAD), maximal 3D diameter, volume, and elongation were measured. Positron emission tomography-CT and PET-CT follow-up and/or histology served as the reference standard. Statistical analysis encompassed intraclass correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The standard of reference revealed involvement in 116 (45%) of 257 lymph nodes. Manual and semiautomated LAD and SAD showed good correlation with intraclass coefficients of 0.85 and 0.72, respectively. Semiautomated prediction of malignant lymph nodes revealed the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for volume (0.760; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.639-0.887) followed by SAD (0.740; 95% CI, 0.616-0.862). The findings for LAD (0.722; 95% CI, 0.588-0.855), maximal 3D diameter (0.697; 95% CI, 0.565-0.830), and lymph node elongation (0.605; 95% CI, 0.466-0.745) were significantly lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric lymph node analysis is significantly superior compared with established LAD in the prediction of lymph node involvement and therefore can add to the definition of peripheral lymphoma target lesions.
Authors: A J Höink; J Weßling; R Koch; C Schülke; N Kohlhase; L Wassenaar; R M Mesters; M D'Anastasi; M Fabel; A Wulff; D Pinto dos Santos; A Kießling; A Graser; V Dicken; M Karpitschka; L Bornemann; W Heindel; B Buerke Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Paul Flechsig; Christina Walker; Clemens Kratochwil; Laila König; Andrei Iagura; Jan Moltz; Tim Holland-Letz; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Uwe Haberkorn; Frederik L Giesel Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Paul Flechsig; Philipp Frank; Clemens Kratochwil; Gerald Antoch; Daniel Rath; Jan Moltz; Michael Rieser; Arne Warth; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Lawrence H Schwartz; Uwe Haberkorn; Frederik L Giesel Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Carlos I Basilio-de-Leo; Christian I Villeda-Sandoval; Carolina Culebro-García; Francisco Rodríguez-Covarrubias; Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Raphael Sexauer; Thomas Weikert; Kevin Mader; Andreas Wicki; Sabine Schädelin; Bram Stieltjes; Jens Bremerich; Gregor Sommer; Alexander W Sauter Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 3.161