Literature DB >> 20656160

Corneal power measurement with a rotating Scheimpflug imaging system after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Pawan Prasher1, Orkun Muftuoglu, R Wayne Bowman, H Dwight Cavanagh, James P McCulley, V Vinod Mootha.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate alterations in corneal power parameters after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using rotating Scheimpflug imaging.
SETTING: University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
METHODS: Eyes that had DSAEK were evaluated with a rotating Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam). The outcome parameters were mean anterior and posterior keratometry (K), mean anterior radius of curvature and posterior radius of curvature, anterior and posterior astigmatism, central corneal thickness (CCT), true net power, corneal volume, keratometric power deviation, and mean zonal-equivalent K readings. These values were compared with those in a control group of age and sex-matched normal eyes.
RESULTS: The DSAEK group comprised 32 eyes (28 patients) and the control group, 32 eyes. The mean anterior K, posterior K, and true net power were 42.53 diopters (D) +/- 1.52 (SD), -6.80 +/- 0.55 D, and 40.55 +/- 1.79 D, respectively, in the DSAEK group and 43.60 +/- 1.62 D, -6.20 +/- 0.31 D, and 42.49 +/- 1.57 D, respectively, in the control group. The posterior radius of curvature, anterior and posterior K values, and true net power were statistically significantly lower in DSAEK eyes than in control eyes (P<.01). The equivalent K readings were significantly lower in all zones in DSAEK eyes than in control eyes (P<.01). The mean CCT was significantly higher in DSAEK eyes than in control eyes (628 +/- 46 mum versus 553 +/- 35 mum) (P<.01).
CONCLUSION: The true net power of the cornea decreased significantly after DSAEK, mainly because of an increase in posterior curvature. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Copyright 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20656160     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric endothelial keratoplasty: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Masomeh Mohebbi; Mohammad Mehrpour; Amin Dehghani Sanij; Nader Mohammadi; Masoud Mirghorbani
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Optimization of intraocular lens constant improves refractive outcomes in combined endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery.

Authors:  Gustavo Bonfadini; John G Ladas; Hamilton Moreira; Mauro Campos; Mario Matthaei; Beatriz Muñoz; Kim Pratzer; Albert S Jun
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Postkeratoplasty Anterior and Posterior Corneal Surface Wavefront Analysis: Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Maria L Salvetat; Marco Zeppieri; Flavia Miani; Paolo Brusini
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-12

4.  Determinants of posterior corneal biometric measurements in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Wesley Chong; Huiqi Huang; Tien Yin Wong; Ming-Guang He; Tin Aung; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Keratometric measurements and IOL calculations in pseudophakic post-DSAEK patients.

Authors:  Ke Xu; Hong Qi; Rongmei Peng; Gege Xiao; Jing Hong; Yansheng Hao; Boping Ma
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.209

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.