Literature DB >> 20656153

Effect of the angle of the operating microscope light beam on visual recovery after phacoemulsification: Randomized trial.

Francesca E Harman1, Melanie C Corbett, Julian D Stevens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in visual recovery after phacoemulsification with direct or tilted surgical microscope illumination using a macular photostress test.
SETTING: Western Eye Hospital, Imperial College Health Care National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.
METHODS: This randomized double-masked controlled trial enrolled patients presenting to a daycare unit for single-eye cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria were no ocular pathology other than cataract, corneal keratometric astigmatism less than 1.50 diopters, intended target of emmetropia in the operated eye, and cataract grade 1 to 3 (Lens Opacification Classification System II). Exclusion criteria were an abnormal preoperative photostress test. Patients were randomized to have phacoemulsification with the operating microscope angled 15 degrees nasal to the fovea (study group) or with the operating microscope directly overhead around the optic disc region (control group). The same surgeon performed all phacoemulsification procedures using a standardized technique and topical anesthesia. Outcome measures were uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity 10 minutes and 60 minutes postoperatively.
RESULTS: In the 30 patients evaluated, the mean UDVA 10 minutes postoperatively was 0.40 logMAR +/- 0.26 (SD) in the study group and 0.72 +/- 0.36 logMAR in the control group (P<.01). The mean CDVA was 0.18 +/- 0.26 logMAR and 0.44 +/- 0.30 logMAR, respectively (P = .016). There was no significant between-group difference in acuity at 60 minutes.
CONCLUSION: Tilting the microscope beam away from the fovea resulted in faster visual recovery and less macular photic stress. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Copyright 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20656153     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  3 in total

1.  Contrast, visibility, and color balance between the microscope versus intracameral illumination in cataract surgery using a 3D visualization system.

Authors:  Young Jae Kim; Yu Jeong Kim; Dong Heun Nam; Kwang Gi Kim; Seong-Woo Kim; Tae-Young Chung; Sung Jin Lee; Kyu-Hyung Park
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 2.  Clear corneal incision in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ammar M Al Mahmood; Samar A Al-Swailem; Ashley Behrens
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

3.  Light exposure from microscope versus intracameral illumination during cataract surgery.

Authors:  Yu Jeong Kim; Dong Heun Nam; Young Jae Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Seong-Woo Kim; Tae-Young Chung; Sung Jin Lee; Kyu Hyung Park
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.