OBJECTIVES: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active form of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which is currently used off-label as immunosuppressive therapy in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize the pharmacokinetics (MPA-PK) and pharmacodynamics (MPA-PD) of MPA and (2) explore the relationship between MPA-PK and cSLE disease activity. METHODS: MPA-PK [area under the curve from 0-12 hours (AUC(0-12))] and MPA-PD [inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity] were evaluated in cSLE patients on stable MMF dosing. Change in SLE disease activity while on MMF therapy was measured using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index. RESULTS: A total of 19 AUC(0-12) and 10 IMPDH activity profiles were included in the analysis. Large interpatient variability in MPA exposure (AUC(0-12)) was observed (mean ± SE: 32 ± 4.2 mg h/L; coefficient of variation: 57%). Maximum MPA serum concentrations coincided with maximum IMPDH inhibition. AUC(0-12) and weight-adjusted MMF dosing were only moderately correlated (r = 0.56, P = 0.01). An AUC(0-12) of ≥30 mg h/L was associated with decreased BILAG scores while on MMF therapy (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Weight-adjusted MMF dosing alone does not reliably allow for the prediction of exposure to biologically active MPA in cSLE. Individualized dosing considering MPA-PK appears warranted as this allows for better estimation of immunologic suppression (IMPDH activity). Additional controlled studies are necessary to confirm that an MPA AUC(0-12) of at least 30 mg h/L is required for cSLE improvement.
OBJECTIVES:Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active form of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which is currently used off-label as immunosuppressive therapy in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize the pharmacokinetics (MPA-PK) and pharmacodynamics (MPA-PD) of MPA and (2) explore the relationship between MPA-PK and cSLE disease activity. METHODS:MPA-PK [area under the curve from 0-12 hours (AUC(0-12))] and MPA-PD [inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity] were evaluated in cSLE patients on stable MMF dosing. Change in SLE disease activity while on MMF therapy was measured using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index. RESULTS: A total of 19 AUC(0-12) and 10 IMPDH activity profiles were included in the analysis. Large interpatient variability in MPA exposure (AUC(0-12)) was observed (mean ± SE: 32 ± 4.2 mg h/L; coefficient of variation: 57%). Maximum MPA serum concentrations coincided with maximum IMPDH inhibition. AUC(0-12) and weight-adjusted MMF dosing were only moderately correlated (r = 0.56, P = 0.01). An AUC(0-12) of ≥30 mg h/L was associated with decreased BILAG scores while on MMF therapy (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Weight-adjusted MMF dosing alone does not reliably allow for the prediction of exposure to biologically active MPA in cSLE. Individualized dosing considering MPA-PK appears warranted as this allows for better estimation of immunologic suppression (IMPDH activity). Additional controlled studies are necessary to confirm that an MPA AUC(0-12) of at least 30 mg h/L is required for cSLE improvement.
Authors: P Glander; K P Braun; P Hambach; S Bauer; I Mai; I Roots; J Waiser; L Fritsche; H H Neumayer; K Budde Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: P J Gregoor; R G de Sévaux; R J Hené; C J Hesse; L B Hilbrands; P Vos; T van Gelder; A J Hoitsma; W Weimar Journal: Transplantation Date: 1999-11-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Catherine M T Sherwin; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Hermine I Brunner; Jens Goebel; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: D R Kuypers; K Claes; P Evenepoel; B Maes; W Coosemans; J Pirenne; Y Vanrenterghem Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Rina Mina; Emily von Scheven; Stacy P Ardoin; B Anne Eberhard; Marilynn Punaro; Norman Ilowite; Joyce Hsu; Marisa Klein-Gitelman; L Nandini Moorthy; Eyal Muscal; Suhas M Radhakrishna; Linda Wagner-Weiner; Matthew Adams; Peter Blier; Lenore Buckley; Elizabeth Chalom; Gaëlle Chédeville; Andrew Eichenfield; Natalya Fish; Michael Henrickson; Aimee O Hersh; Roger Hollister; Olcay Jones; Lawrence Jung; Deborah Levy; Jorge Lopez-Benitez; Deborah McCurdy; Paivi M Miettunen; Ana I Quintero-del Rio; Deborah Rothman; Ornella Rullo; Natasha Ruth; Laura E Schanberg; Earl Silverman; Nora G Singer; Jennifer Soep; Reema Syed; Larry B Vogler; Ali Yalcindag; Cagri Yildirim-Toruner; Carol A Wallace; Hermine I Brunner Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Hermine I Brunner; Michael R Bennett; Gaurav Gulati; Khalid Abulaban; Marisa S Klein-Gitelman; Stacy P Ardoin; Lori B Tucker; Kelly A Rouster-Stevens; David Witte; Jun Ying; Prasad Devarajan Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Catherine M T Sherwin; Anna Carmela P Sagcal-Gironella; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Hermine I Brunner; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Azrin N Abd Rahman; Susan E Tett; Halim A Abdul Gafor; Brett C McWhinney; Christine E Staatz Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 2.441
Authors: Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Hermine I Brunner; Anna Carmela P Sagcal-Gironella; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Xiaoyan Yang; Catherine M T Sherwin; Tian Yu; Venkata K Yellepeddi; Hermine I Brunner; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 5.045