Literature DB >> 20655313

Recommendations for the validation of flow cytometric testing during drug development: I instrumentation.

Cherie L Green1, Lynette Brown, Jennifer J Stewart, Yuanxin Xu, Virginia Litwin, Thomas W Mc Closkey.   

Abstract

Flow cytometry is a powerful and flexible analytical tool used during all stages of drug development. While substantial effort is invested in development and validation of analytical methods, instrument validation is often neglected. Flow cytometers are evolving at a pace that surpasses the protracted timeline of drug discovery and development. Therefore, it becomes fundamentally important to the success of the study to document the validated state of the flow cytometer and verify data integrity at the time of study conduct. It is important to bear in mind that validation strategies are critical components of the entire process involved in bringing new therapeutic options to the medical community; drugs which eventually manifest as successful new treatments for those individuals afflicted with disease. Formal industry guidance is provided through Good Laboratory Practices [GLP], which require validation of all computerized systems and equipment used to support pre-clinical studies for regulatory submissions. Key elements of instrument validation processes have been delineated through guidance documents published by regulatory agencies and industry working groups to support the rigorous compliance needs of GLP. However, most testing to support drug development is conducted in less strict regulatory environments. Such comprehensive validation efforts may not be appropriate for laboratories supporting early discovery or basic research, however, laboratories involved in regulated stages of development, such as pre-clinical and clinical phases, should consider these recommendations. This paper presents a consensus methodological approach that the authors have used successfully to ensure data integrity in flow cytometric studies conducted during drug development.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20655313     DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  6 in total

Review 1.  Immunophenotyping: Analytical approaches and role in preclinical development of nanomedicines.

Authors:  Hannah S Newton; Marina A Dobrovolskaia
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 17.873

2.  Cellular Immunity Is Critical for Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness in Immunocompromised Individuals.

Authors:  Eustache Paramithiotis; Scott Sugden; Eszter Papp; Marie Bonhomme; Todd Chermak; Stephanie Y Crawford; Stefanie Z Demetriades; Gerson Galdos; Bruce L Lambert; John Mattison; Thomas McDade; Stephane Pillet; Robert Murphy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  A Semi-automated Approach to Preparing Antibody Cocktails for Immunophenotypic Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Koguchi; Iliana L Gonzalez; Tanisha L Meeuwsen; William L Miller; Daniel P Haley; Alice N Tanibata-Branham; Keith S Bahjat
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Receptor occupancy assessment by flow cytometry as a pharmacodynamic biomarker in biopharmaceutical development.

Authors:  Meina Liang; Martin Schwickart; Amy K Schneider; Inna Vainshtein; Christopher Del Nagro; Nathan Standifer; Lorin K Roskos
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.058

5.  FLT3, a prognostic biomarker for acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Quantitative monitoring with a simple anti-FLT3 interaction and flow cytometric method.

Authors:  Chadarat Ampasavate; Wasimon Jutapakdee; Rungsinee Phongpradist; Singkome Tima; Adisak Tantiworawit; Pimlak Charoenkwan; Dujrudee Chinwong; Songyot Anuchapreeda
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Evaluation of assay interference and interpretation of CXCR4 receptor occupancy results in a preclinical study with MEDI3185, a fully human antibody to CXCR4.

Authors:  Martin Schwickart; Carlos Chavez; Simon Henderson; Inna Vainshtein; Nathan Standifer; Christopher DelNagro; Freshta Mehrzai; Amy Schneider; Lorin Roskos; Meina Liang
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.058

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.