PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the physics contributions and the clinical outcome with preliminary 3D MRI-guided low dose-rate (LDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) experience in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with primary locally advanced cervical carcinoma were analyzed. The median tumoral cervical volume was 48.0 cc (range 1-468 cc). Twenty-four patients (53%) had histological and/or radiological pelvic involvement. After pelvic+/-paraaortic concomitant chemoradiation, a LDR BT boost was delivered to a 3D MRI-based clinical target volume taking into account dose volume constraints for critical organs and optimization of target volume coverage. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 53 months (range 31-79 months), the 4-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 57 (95%CI, 43-69) and 52% (95%CI, 40-64), respectively. Adding EBRT and LDR using EQD2 model, the median D(100) and D(90) for the IR-CTV were 56.5 Gy(alpha/beta10) (range 37-83 Gy(alpha/beta10)) and 69 Gy(alpha/beta10) (range 52-113 Gy(alpha/beta10)), respectively. For HR-CTV, the median D(100) and D(90) were 67 Gy(alpha/beta10) (range 47-119 Gy(alpha/beta10)) and 79 Gy(alpha/beta10) (range 53-122 Gy(alpha/beta10)), respectively. Thirty-nine late complications were observed in 28 patients (33.3%): 13 bladder, 7 rectal, 5 small bowel, 4 urethral, 3 colic, 2 vaginal, 1 pelvic fibrosis, and 4 others. Four grade 3 delayed complications were observed and no grade 4 complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Applying an individual treatment planning with 3D MRI-guided LDR brachytherapy appears to be feasible and efficient for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in routine clinical practice. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the physics contributions and the clinical outcome with preliminary 3D MRI-guided low dose-rate (LDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) experience in locally advanced cervical cancerpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients with primary locally advanced cervical carcinoma were analyzed. The median tumoral cervical volume was 48.0 cc (range 1-468 cc). Twenty-four patients (53%) had histological and/or radiological pelvic involvement. After pelvic+/-paraaortic concomitant chemoradiation, a LDR BT boost was delivered to a 3D MRI-based clinical target volume taking into account dose volume constraints for critical organs and optimization of target volume coverage. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 53 months (range 31-79 months), the 4-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 57 (95%CI, 43-69) and 52% (95%CI, 40-64), respectively. Adding EBRT and LDR using EQD2 model, the median D(100) and D(90) for the IR-CTV were 56.5 Gy(alpha/beta10) (range 37-83 Gy(alpha/beta10)) and 69 Gy(alpha/beta10) (range 52-113 Gy(alpha/beta10)), respectively. For HR-CTV, the median D(100) and D(90) were 67 Gy(alpha/beta10) (range 47-119 Gy(alpha/beta10)) and 79 Gy(alpha/beta10) (range 53-122 Gy(alpha/beta10)), respectively. Thirty-nine late complications were observed in 28 patients (33.3%): 13 bladder, 7 rectal, 5 small bowel, 4 urethral, 3 colic, 2 vaginal, 1 pelvic fibrosis, and 4 others. Four grade 3 delayed complications were observed and no grade 4 complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Applying an individual treatment planning with 3D MRI-guided LDR brachytherapy appears to be feasible and efficient for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in routine clinical practice. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: K Kirchheiner; E Fidarova; R A Nout; M P Schmid; A Sturdza; E Wiebe; A Kranz; S Polterauer; R Pötter; W Dörr Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-09-29 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: M P Schmid; R Pötter; P Brader; A Kratochwil; G Goldner; K Kirchheiner; A Sturdza; C Kirisits Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: P Georg; A Boni; A Ghabuous; G Goldner; M P Schmid; D Georg; R Pötter; W Dörr Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: M P Schmid; B Mansmann; M Federico; J C A Dimopoulous; P Georg; E Fidarova; W Dörr; R Pötter Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Akila N Viswanathan; Beth Erickson; David K Gaffney; Sushil Beriwal; Sudershan K Bhatia; Omer Lee Burnett; David P D'Souza; Nikhilesh Patil; Michael G Haddock; Anuja Jhingran; Ellen L Jones; Charles A Kunos; Larissa J Lee; Lilie L Lin; Nina A Mayr; Ivy Petersen; Primoz Petric; Lorraine Portelance; William Small; Jonathan B Strauss; Kanokpis Townamchai; Aaron H Wolfson; Catheryn M Yashar; Walter Bosch Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038