BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a purely restrictive procedure that has been proved to be an effective tool in achieving weight loss. The low operative morbidity and reversibility are often seen as advantages of this procedure compared with other bariatric approaches. We have attempted to define the reasons for revisional surgery after LAGB and the outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed from February 2001 to October 2008 at a center of excellence after institutional review board approval. The patients who had undergone revisional surgery after primary LAGB were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 343 patients who had undergone primary LAGB, 60 subsequently underwent a revisional procedure. In addition, 28 revisional procedures were performed on patients who had undergone primary LAGB at an outside institution. These procedures included 39 (44.3%) band removals alone, 12 (13.6%) band removals with conversion to sleeve gastrectomy, 13 (14.8%) band removals with conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 9 (10.2%) band repositioning, and 2 (2.3%) band replacements. In addition, 13 (14.8%) port-related procedures (3 relocations, 6 reconnections, and 4 replacements/removals) were performed. CONCLUSION: Although reversible and efficacious, LAGB appears to have a high incidence of complications requiring revisional surgery and/or band removal. The results of our study have shown that laparoscopic revisional surgery after primary LAGB is safe and can be performed with minimal morbidity. Copyright 2010 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a purely restrictive procedure that has been proved to be an effective tool in achieving weight loss. The low operative morbidity and reversibility are often seen as advantages of this procedure compared with other bariatric approaches. We have attempted to define the reasons for revisional surgery after LAGB and the outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed from February 2001 to October 2008 at a center of excellence after institutional review board approval. The patients who had undergone revisional surgery after primary LAGB were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 343 patients who had undergone primary LAGB, 60 subsequently underwent a revisional procedure. In addition, 28 revisional procedures were performed on patients who had undergone primary LAGB at an outside institution. These procedures included 39 (44.3%) band removals alone, 12 (13.6%) band removals with conversion to sleeve gastrectomy, 13 (14.8%) band removals with conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 9 (10.2%) band repositioning, and 2 (2.3%) band replacements. In addition, 13 (14.8%) port-related procedures (3 relocations, 6 reconnections, and 4 replacements/removals) were performed. CONCLUSION: Although reversible and efficacious, LAGB appears to have a high incidence of complications requiring revisional surgery and/or band removal. The results of our study have shown that laparoscopic revisional surgery after primary LAGB is safe and can be performed with minimal morbidity. Copyright 2010 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Selim G Gebran; Brooks Knighton; Ledibabari M Ngaage; John A Rose; Michael P Grant; Fan Liang; Arthur J Nam; Stephen M Kavic; Mark D Kligman; Yvonne M Rasko Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Simon Kuesters; Jodok M Grueneberger; Tobias Baumann; Waleed Bukhari; Marc Daoud; Ulrich T Hopt; Wojciech K Karcz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Lars Fischer; Caroline Hildebrandt; Thomas Bruckner; Hannes Kenngott; Georg R Linke; Tobias Gehrig; Markus W Büchler; Beat P Müller-Stich Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: A Alhamdani; M Wilson; T Jones; L Taqvi; P Gonsalves; M Boyle; K Mahawar; S Balupuri; P K Small Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Pierre Y Garneau; Omar Abouzahr; Fabio Garofalo; Naif AlEnazi; Simon L Bacon; Ronald Denis; Radu Pescarus; Henri Atlas Journal: J Minim Access Surg Date: 2020 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 1.407