Literature DB >> 20654469

Interlaboratory validation of in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (2) Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) test.

S Hagino1, S Kinoshita, N Tani, T Nakamura, N Ono, K Konishi, H Iimura, H Kojima, Y Ohno.   

Abstract

A chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay evaluates the blood vessel reaction and damage to the CAM of a fertilized hen's egg. Two types of CAM assays, the hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) method and the chorioallantoic membrane-trypan blue staining (CAM-TB) method, were evaluated as alternative methods to the Draize eye irritation test (Draize test). The validation project was composed of three test phases in which 10, 15 and 14 test chemicals, respectively, were evaluated. The test procedure of the five independent laboratories was controlled under the same standard operating procedure (SOP). The interlaboratory variation was relatively high for both methods. However, the rank correlation was relatively high among the values obtained by the five laboratories. The variation associated with the CAM-TB method was smaller than that of the HET-CAM method, which requires macroscopic observation, suggesting that the objectivity and quantitativeness differs between the assay systems. The average values using these two methods were compared with the maximum average Draize total score (MAS). The correlation coefficient (r) between the HET-CAM scores and the MAS was 0.688. This suggests that a simple linear regression may not be appropriate for HET-CAM. However, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) was relatively high (rs=0.802). In contrast, the CAM-TB test results showed a good correlation with the MAS when the test chemicals were classified according to their physical properties (r=0.801, liquid and r=0.926, powder). These results suggest that both the HET-CAM and CAM-TB methods may present alternative method of evaluation of eye irritation despite problems of interlaboratory reproducibility.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 20654469     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2333(98)00065-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  4 in total

Review 1.  The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and bioengineering.

Authors:  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Tatiana Segura; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 9.596

Review 2.  Alternatives to In Vivo Draize Rabbit Eye and Skin Irritation Tests with a Focus on 3D Reconstructed Human Cornea-Like Epithelium and Epidermis Models.

Authors:  Miri Lee; Jee-Hyun Hwang; Kyung-Min Lim
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2017-07-15

3.  Physical Characterization and In Vitro Toxicity Test of PDMS Synthesized from Low-Grade D4 Monomer as a Vitreous Substitute in the Human Eyes.

Authors:  Diba Grace Auliya; Soni Setiadji; Fitrilawati Fitrilawati; Risdiana Risdiana
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-01-02

4.  Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods.

Authors:  Els Adriaens; João Barroso; Chantra Eskes; Sebastian Hoffmann; Pauline McNamee; Nathalie Alépée; Sandrine Bessou-Touya; Ann De Smedt; Bart De Wever; Uwe Pfannenbecker; Magalie Tailhardat; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.