Murali Varma1, John M Morgan. 1. Department of Histopathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK. wptmv@cf.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: Prostate gland volume is generally assessed by transrectal ultrasound examination or magnetic resonance imaging at the time of prostatic biopsy or pre-brachytherapy planning. The volume is most commonly measured using the formula, prostate volume = height x width x length x pi/6, which is derived considering the gland as ellipsoid. There are conflicting data regarding the accuracy of this method, with most studies comparing this calculated volume with that measured radiologically using planimetry with summation of sequential area measurements. The aim was to determine the relationship between prostate gland volume and weight. METHODS AND RESULTS: The accuracy of prostate gland volume calculated from three-dimensional measurements of the gland in 20 radical prostatectomy specimens relative to the true gland volume determined using water displacement was prospectively evaluated. Since volume measurement by water displacement is not practical in routine practice, the relationship between prostate weight and volume was also evaluated. Our findings indicate that the calculated gland volume consistently underestimates the true volume. The volume of the prostate gland (in cm(3)) very closely correlates with its weight (in g). CONCLUSIONS: The weight of the prostate gland (without the seminal vesicles) is an excellent surrogate for prostate volume. The prostate gland in radical prostatectomy specimens should be weighed after transecting the seminal vesicles at the base.
AIMS: Prostate gland volume is generally assessed by transrectal ultrasound examination or magnetic resonance imaging at the time of prostatic biopsy or pre-brachytherapy planning. The volume is most commonly measured using the formula, prostate volume = height x width x length x pi/6, which is derived considering the gland as ellipsoid. There are conflicting data regarding the accuracy of this method, with most studies comparing this calculated volume with that measured radiologically using planimetry with summation of sequential area measurements. The aim was to determine the relationship between prostate gland volume and weight. METHODS AND RESULTS: The accuracy of prostate gland volume calculated from three-dimensional measurements of the gland in 20 radical prostatectomy specimens relative to the true gland volume determined using water displacement was prospectively evaluated. Since volume measurement by water displacement is not practical in routine practice, the relationship between prostate weight and volume was also evaluated. Our findings indicate that the calculated gland volume consistently underestimates the true volume. The volume of the prostate gland (in cm(3)) very closely correlates with its weight (in g). CONCLUSIONS: The weight of the prostate gland (without the seminal vesicles) is an excellent surrogate for prostate volume. The prostate gland in radical prostatectomy specimens should be weighed after transecting the seminal vesicles at the base.
Authors: Julie C Bulman; Robert Toth; Amish D Patel; B Nicolas Bloch; Colm J McMahon; Long Ngo; Anant Madabhushi; Neil M Rofsky Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nicholas R Paterson; Luke T Lavallée; Laura N Nguyen; Kelsey Witiuk; James Ross; Ranjeeta Mallick; Wael Shabana; Blair MacDonald; Nicola Scheida; Dean Fergusson; Franco Momoli; Sonya Cnossen; Christopher Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Rodney H Breau Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Nazanin Hajarol Asvadi; Sohrab Afshari Mirak; Amirhossein Mohammadian Bajgiran; Pooria Khoshnoodi; Pornphan Wibulpolprasert; Daniel Margolis; Anthony Sisk; Robert E Reiter; Steven S Raman Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2018-11
Authors: Jiwoong Yu; Young Suk Kwon; Sinae Kim; Christopher Sejong Han; Nicholas Farber; Jongmyung Kim; Seok Soo Byun; Wun-Jae Kim; Seong Soo Jeon; Isaac Yi Kim Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Carlo Andrea Bravi; Emily Vertosick; Amy Tin; Simone Scuderi; Giuseppe Fallara; Giuseppe Rosiello; Elio Mazzone; Marco Bandini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Massimo Freschi; Rodolfo Montironi; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Andrew Vickers Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2018-11-24
Authors: Izak Faiena; Sinae Kim; Nicholas Farber; Young Suk Kwon; Brian Shinder; Neal Patel; Amirali H Salmasi; Thomas Jang; Eric A Singer; Wun-Jae Kim; Isaac Y Kim Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-09-28