INTRODUCTION: A Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) is a novel quality improvement initiative that standardizes the assessment and management of all patients who carry a predefined diagnosis. Based on periodic review of systemically collected data the SCAMP is designed to be modified to improve its own algorithm. One of the objectives of a SCAMP is to identify and reduce resource utilization and patient care costs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed resource utilization in the first 93 arterial switch operation (ASO) SCAMP patients and 186 age-matched control ASO patients. We compared diagnostic and laboratory testing obtained at the initial SCAMP clinic visit and control patient visits. To evaluate the effect of the SCAMP over time, the number of clinic visits per patient year and echocardiograms per patient year in historical control ASO patients were compared to the projected rates for ASO SCAMP participants. RESULTS: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), stress echocardiogram, and lipid profile utilization were higher in the initial SCAMP clinic visit group than in age-matched control patients. Total echocardiogram and lung scan usage were similar. Chest X-ray and exercise stress testing were obtained less in SCAMP patients. ASO SCAMP patients are projected to have 0.5 clinic visits and 0.5 echocardiograms per year. Historical control patients had more clinic visits (1.2 vs. 0.5 visits/patient year, P<.01) and a higher echocardiogram rate (0.92 vs. 0.5 echocardiograms/patient year, P<.01) CONCLUSION: Implementation of a SCAMP may initially lead to increased resource utilization, but over time resource utilization is projected to decrease.
INTRODUCTION: A Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) is a novel quality improvement initiative that standardizes the assessment and management of all patients who carry a predefined diagnosis. Based on periodic review of systemically collected data the SCAMP is designed to be modified to improve its own algorithm. One of the objectives of a SCAMP is to identify and reduce resource utilization and patient care costs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed resource utilization in the first 93 arterial switch operation (ASO) SCAMPpatients and 186 age-matched control ASO patients. We compared diagnostic and laboratory testing obtained at the initial SCAMP clinic visit and control patient visits. To evaluate the effect of the SCAMP over time, the number of clinic visits per patient year and echocardiograms per patient year in historical control ASO patients were compared to the projected rates for ASO SCAMPparticipants. RESULTS: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), stress echocardiogram, and lipid profile utilization were higher in the initial SCAMP clinic visit group than in age-matched control patients. Total echocardiogram and lung scan usage were similar. Chest X-ray and exercise stress testing were obtained less in SCAMPpatients. ASO SCAMPpatients are projected to have 0.5 clinic visits and 0.5 echocardiograms per year. Historical control patients had more clinic visits (1.2 vs. 0.5 visits/patient year, P<.01) and a higher echocardiogram rate (0.92 vs. 0.5 echocardiograms/patient year, P<.01) CONCLUSION: Implementation of a SCAMP may initially lead to increased resource utilization, but over time resource utilization is projected to decrease.
Authors: J Losay; A Touchot; A Serraf; A Litvinova; V Lambert; J D Piot; F Lacour-Gayet; A Capderou; C Planche Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-09-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat; Timothy M Morgan; Christina M Neagle; Kerry M Link; Craig A Hamilton; W Gregory Hundley Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: J D Schuijf; L J Shaw; W Wijns; H J Lamb; D Poldermans; A de Roos; E E van der Wall; J J Bax Journal: Heart Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; Timothy M Morgan; Christina M Neagle; Craig A Hamilton; Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat; Kerry M Link Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Price; A Ekleberry; A Grover; S Melendy; K Baddam; J McMahon; M Villalba; M Johnson; M J Zervos Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: A Legendre; J Losay; A Touchot-Koné; A Serraf; E Belli; J D Piot; V Lambert; A Capderou; C Planche Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Diego Porras; David W Brown; Rahul Rathod; Kevin Friedman; Kimberly Gauvreau; James E Lock; Jesse J Esch; Lisa Bergersen; Audrey C Marshall Journal: Congenit Heart Dis Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Sean M Lang; R Lee Crawford; Pushpa Shivaram; Joshua A Daily; Elijah H Bolin; Xinyu Tang; R Thomas Collins Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Michael L O'Byrne; Andrew C Glatz; Lihai Song; Heather M Griffis; Marisa E Millenson; Matthew J Gillespie; Yoav Dori; Aaron G DeWitt; Christopher E Mascio; Jonathan J Rome Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rahul H Rathod; Michael Farias; Kevin G Friedman; Dionne Graham; David R Fulton; Jane W Newburger; Steven Colan; Kathy Jenkins; James E Lock Journal: Congenit Heart Dis Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Juan Villafañe; M Regina Lantin-Hermoso; Ami B Bhatt; James S Tweddell; Tal Geva; Meena Nathan; Martin J Elliott; Victoria L Vetter; Stephen M Paridon; Lazaros Kochilas; Kathy J Jenkins; Robert H Beekman; Gil Wernovsky; Jeffrey A Towbin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 24.094