Literature DB >> 20653622

Is Vancouver Canada's supervised injection facility cost-saving?

Steven D Pinkerton1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Vancouver's Insite supervised injection facility and syringe exchange programs are cost-saving--that is, are the savings due to averted HIV-related medical care costs sufficient to offset Insite's operating costs?
METHODS: The analyses examined the impact of Insite's programs for a single year. Mathematical models were used to calculate the number of additional HIV infections that would be expected if Insite were closed. The life-time HIV-related medical costs associated with these additional infections were compared to the annual operating costs of the Insite facility.
RESULTS: If Insite were closed, the annual number of incident HIV infections among Vancouver IDU would be expected to increase from 179.3 to 262.8. These 83.5 preventable infections are associated with $17.6 million (Canadian) in life-time HIV-related medical care costs, greatly exceeding Insite's operating costs, which are approximately $3 million per year.
CONCLUSIONS: Insite's safe injection facility and syringe exchange program substantially reduce the incidence of HIV infection within Vancouver's IDU community. The associated savings in averted HIV-related medical care costs are more than sufficient to offset Insite's operating costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20653622     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02977.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  20 in total

1.  Reducing the adverse impact of injection drug use in Canada.

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; John M Embil
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Does evidence support supervised injection sites?

Authors:  Jennifer Ng; Christy Sutherland; Michael R Kolber
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Public Health and Public Order Outcomes Associated with Supervised Drug Consumption Facilities: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mary Clare Kennedy; Mohammad Karamouzian; Thomas Kerr
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.071

4.  A decline in the prevalence of injecting drug users in Estonia, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Anneli Uusküla; Kristiina Rajaleid; Ave Talu; Katri Abel-Ollo; Don C Des Jarlais
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2013-01-03

5.  Commentary on Enns et al. (2016): Supervised injection facilities as a cost-effective intervention.

Authors:  Nadia Fairbairn; Evan Wood
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Examining the potential role of a supervised injection facility in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, to avert HIV among people who inject drugs.

Authors:  Ehsan Jozaghi; Asheka Jackson
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-03-29

Review 7.  HIV and the criminalisation of drug use among people who inject drugs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kora DeBeck; Tessa Cheng; Julio S Montaner; Chris Beyrer; Richard Elliott; Susan Sherman; Evan Wood; Stefan Baral
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 12.767

8.  Combined prevention for persons who inject drugs in the HIV epidemic in a transitional country: the case of Tallinn, Estonia.

Authors:  Anneli Uusküla; Don C Des Jarlais; Mait Raag; Steven D Pinkerton; Jonathan Feelemyer
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2014-07-23

9.  Syringe exchange in the United States: a national level economic evaluation of hypothetical increases in investment.

Authors:  Trang Quynh Nguyen; Brian W Weir; Don C Des Jarlais; Steven D Pinkerton; David R Holtgrave
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-11

10.  A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of proposed supervised injection facilities in Montreal, Canada.

Authors:  Ehsan Jozaghi; Andrew A Reid; Martin A Andresen
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2013-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.