Literature DB >> 20653458

Does the chronotype classification need to be updated? Preliminary findings.

Bruno Jacson Martynhak1, Fernando Mazzilli Louzada, Mário Pedrazzoli, John Fontenele Araujo.   

Abstract

Traditionally, chronotype classification is based on the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). It is implicit in the classification that intermediate individuals get intermediate scores to most of the MEQ questions. However, a small group of individuals has a different pattern of answers. In some questions, they answer as "morning-types" and in some others they answer as "evening-types," resulting in an intermediate total score. "Evening-type" and "Morning-type" answers were set as A(1) and A(4), respectively. Intermediate answers were set as A(2) and A(3). The following algorithm was applied: Bimodality Index = (Sigma A(1) x Sigma A(4))(2) - (Sigma A(2) x Sigma A(3))(2). Neither-types that had positive bimodality scores were classified as bimodal. If our hypothesis is validated by objective data, an update of chronotype classification will be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20653458     DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2010.490314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  1 in total

1.  Chronotype and breast cancer risk in a cohort of US nurses.

Authors:  Cody Ramin; Elizabeth E Devore; Jeffrey Pierre-Paul; Jeanne F Duffy; Susan E Hankinson; Eva S Schernhammer
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.877

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.