BACKGROUND: Cystic lymph node metastasis (CLNM) is commonly found in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy in detecting cystic lymph node metastasis from tonsillar SCC between contrast-enhanced CT, ¹⁸F- fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with a tonsillar SCC undergoing a pretreatment contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT followed by a neck dissection as a standard of reference were included. The contrast-enhanced CT part, the ¹⁸F-FDG-PET part, the non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT part, and the contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT were assessed separately for correct N classification and the differentiation of N0 versus N+. RESULTS.: Contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT are equally accurate for correct neck staging. Regarding pN0 versus pN+, contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT are superior to non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT (p = .017). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT perform equally and better than non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting CLNM in tonsillar SCC. Therefore, in patients scheduled for ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, we strongly suggest performing a contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, which is not routine in most centers.
BACKGROUND: Cystic lymph node metastasis (CLNM) is commonly found in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy in detecting cystic lymph node metastasis from tonsillar SCC between contrast-enhanced CT, ¹⁸F- fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with a tonsillar SCC undergoing a pretreatment contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT followed by a neck dissection as a standard of reference were included. The contrast-enhanced CT part, the ¹⁸F-FDG-PET part, the non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT part, and the contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT were assessed separately for correct N classification and the differentiation of N0 versus N+. RESULTS.: Contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT are equally accurate for correct neck staging. Regarding pN0 versus pN+, contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT are superior to non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT (p = .017). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT perform equally and better than non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting CLNM in tonsillar SCC. Therefore, in patients scheduled for ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, we strongly suggest performing a contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, which is not routine in most centers.
Authors: Patrick Veit-Haibach; Daniel Schmid; Klaus Strobel; Jan D Soyka; Niklaus G Schaefer; Stephan K Haerle; Gerhard Huber; Gabriele Studer; Burkhardt Seifert; Thomas F Hany Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-07-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jon Cacicedo; Arturo Navarro; Olga Del Hoyo; Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga; Filippo Alongi; Jose A Medina; Olgun Elicin; Andrea Skanjeti; Francesco Giammarile; Pedro Bilbao; Francisco Casquero; Berardino de Bari; Alan Dal Pra Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Lisa W Lekanne Dit Deprez; Grégoire B Morand; Christian Thüring; Shila Pazahr; Martin W Hüllner; Martina A Broglie Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Young Lan Seo; Dae Young Yoon; Sora Baek; You Jin Ku; Young-Soo Rho; Eun-Jae Chung; Sung Hye Koh Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-05-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Bela S Purohit; Angeliki Ailianou; Nicolas Dulguerov; Christoph D Becker; Osman Ratib; Minerva Becker Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2014-08-26