BACKGROUND: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used effectively for ablation of foregut disorders and also may have a role in treating colonic pathology. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering RFA to locations within the colon and to determine a range of safe treatment parameters. METHODS: Patients undergoing left hemicolectomy or proctocolectomy were evaluated. Focal RFA using a colonoscope-mounted device was delivered to normal segments of the colon and rectum within the planned surgical resection specimen. Endoscopic accessibility and feasibility of delivering heat energy to the colon and rectum were assessed as well as the maximum incurred histologic depth of ablation in relation to the number of applications (2 or 4) and the energy density (12, 15, or 20 J/cm2). RESULTS: A total of 51 ablation zones in 16 patients had available histopathology. None of the sites receiving two applications demonstrated serosal layer alteration compared with 15% of the sites receiving four applications (p=0.11). Muscularis propria alterations were seen in 25% of the two-application sites and 63% of the four-application sites (p<0.05). Increasing energy density from 12 to 20 J/cm2 did not correlate with a deeper ablation effect. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic RFA is capable of delivering therapy to the distal colon. Injury is limited to the muscularis propria or less depth when no more than two ablations are applied regardless of the energy density used. Based on these feasibility and dosimetry results, the authors will continue investigation using these and smaller energy doses to initiate trials ultimately with patients who have suitable mucosal and submucosal disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract including chronic, nonulcerated hemorrhagic radiation proctitis and angiodyplasia.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used effectively for ablation of foregut disorders and also may have a role in treating colonic pathology. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering RFA to locations within the colon and to determine a range of safe treatment parameters. METHODS:Patients undergoing left hemicolectomy or proctocolectomy were evaluated. Focal RFA using a colonoscope-mounted device was delivered to normal segments of the colon and rectum within the planned surgical resection specimen. Endoscopic accessibility and feasibility of delivering heat energy to the colon and rectum were assessed as well as the maximum incurred histologic depth of ablation in relation to the number of applications (2 or 4) and the energy density (12, 15, or 20 J/cm2). RESULTS: A total of 51 ablation zones in 16 patients had available histopathology. None of the sites receiving two applications demonstrated serosal layer alteration compared with 15% of the sites receiving four applications (p=0.11). Muscularis propria alterations were seen in 25% of the two-application sites and 63% of the four-application sites (p<0.05). Increasing energy density from 12 to 20 J/cm2 did not correlate with a deeper ablation effect. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic RFA is capable of delivering therapy to the distal colon. Injury is limited to the muscularis propria or less depth when no more than two ablations are applied regardless of the energy density used. Based on these feasibility and dosimetry results, the authors will continue investigation using these and smaller energy doses to initiate trials ultimately with patients who have suitable mucosal and submucosal disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract including chronic, nonulcerated hemorrhagic radiation proctitis and angiodyplasia.
Authors: A Polychronidis; A K Tsaroucha; A J Karayiannakis; S Perente; E Efstathiou; C Simopoulos Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.671
Authors: Robert A Ganz; Bergein F Overholt; Virender K Sharma; David E Fleischer; Nicholas J Shaheen; Charles J Lightdale; Stephen R Freeman; Ronald E Pruitt; Shiro M Urayama; Frank Gress; Darren A Pavey; M Stanley Branch; Thomas J Savides; Kenneth J Chang; V Raman Muthusamy; Anthony G Bohorfoush; Samuel C Pace; Steven R DeMeester; Viktor E Eysselein; Masoud Panjehpour; George Triadafilopoulos Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-03-19 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: J J Gondrie; R E Pouw; C M T Sondermeijer; F P Peters; W L Curvers; W D Rosmolen; K K Krishnadath; F Ten Kate; P Fockens; J J Bergman Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Seth Andrew Gross; Mohammad Al-Haddad; Kanwar R S Gill; Anthony N Schore; Michael B Wallace Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Aymeric Becq; Marine Camus; Gabriel Rahmi; Vincent de Parades; Philippe Marteau; Xavier Dray Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Tsung-Han Tsai; Chao Zhou; Yuankai K Tao; Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Osman O Ahsen; Marisa Figueiredo; Tejas Kirtane; Desmond C Adler; Joseph M Schmitt; Qin Huang; James G Fujimoto; Hiroshi Mashimo Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Manoop S Bhutani; Rajesh Uthamanthil; Rei Suzuki; Anil Shetty; Sherry A Klumpp; William Nau; Roger Jason Stafford Journal: Endosc Ultrasound Date: 2016 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.628