Literature DB >> 20651268

Current practice versus willingness to enroll in clinical trials: paradox among vascular neurologists about treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Ramy El Khoury1, Marc Fisher, Sean I Savitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Clinical trials are assessing the efficacy of fibrinolysis in extended time windows for acute ischemic stroke.
METHODS: An Internet-based survey was sent to 400 US vascular neurologists affiliated with a university to assess whether there are consensus opinions on how they treat patients beyond 3 hours from symptom onset and which patients they are willing to enroll into clinical trials of fibrinolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
RESULTS: We received 161 responses; 81% were male. Ninety-three percent of respondents treat patients with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator beyond 3 hours. More than 80% were treated beyond 3 hours with intra-arterial therapy (IAT). When asked if IAT improves stroke outcome, >50% selected the choice of "yes for middle cerebral artery and basilar occlusions" and only 2% selected the choice that "IAT does not improve outcome." Over half believe that imaging could be used to approximate the penumbra but with improvements to better identify salvageable tissue. Eighty-seven percent were willing to enroll patients into a placebo-controlled intravenous thrombolysis beyond 3 hours. For IAT trials, >80% would randomize beyond 3 hours with or without prior intravenous treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Vascular neurologists have been treating acute ischemic stroke beyond 3 hours with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator even before the American Heart Association guidelines supported extending the therapeutic window. There is a paradox among the respondents willing to enroll patients into trials involving IAT given that a majority is offering IAT as part of their practice. These results suggest that clinical practice may impair enrollment into trials testing reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20651268     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.586511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  4 in total

1.  Implementation of a patient selection protocol for intra-arterial therapy increases treatment rates in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Natalia S Rost; Eric E Smith; Raul G Nogueira; Kaitlin M Fitzpatrick; Albert J Yoo; Joshua A Hirsch; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 2.  Clinical trial design for endovascular ischemic stroke intervention.

Authors:  Osama O Zaidat; David S Liebeskind; Randall C Edgell; Catherine M Amlie-Lefond; Junaid S Kalia; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Transatlantic Differences in Management of Carotid Stenosis: BRIDGing the Gap in StrokE Management (BRIDGE) Project.

Authors:  Clotilde Balucani; Vanessa Arnedo; Jeremy Weedon; Didier Leys; Jean-Louis Mas; Martin Brown; James C Grotta; Nicole R Gonzales; Werner Hacke; Thomas Brott; Steven R Levine
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2018-01-17

4.  No consensus on definition criteria for stroke registry common data elements.

Authors:  Karen C Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild; H Jeremy Bockholt; George Howard; Andrei Alexandrov; Anne Alexandrov; M Rick Sline; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis Extra       Date:  2011-11-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.