Michael Zappitelli1, Xun Zhang, Bethany J Foster. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. mzaprdr@yahoo.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Estimation of GFR in children from serum creatinine measures in regional databases is limited by a lack of height data. Furthermore, the ability of GFR estimating equations to quantify changes in GFR over time is unknown. Two methods of estimating GFR when height is unknown and the ability of several GFR equations to quantify GFR changes over time were evaluated. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective study included 195 children (mean age 11.9 ± 4.6 years, GFR = 78.8 ± 34.5) who underwent iothalamate GFR, serum creatinine, and height measurements; 93 children underwent a second GFR measurement and 47 a third GFR measurement. Four equations were evaluated for bias and precision and for quantifying GFR change over time: (1) Schwartz, using measured height; (2) Schwartz, using estimated height (based on previous height percentile); (3) a locally derived modification of a previously derived height-independent equation. RESULTS: The Schwartz (measured height) displayed the least bias (-2 to +7%), followed by the modified height-independent equation and Schwartz (estimated height). All equations were imprecise. All equations performed similarly at capturing change in measured GFR over time, with no significant difference between estimated and measured GFR percentage change over time. The height-estimated Schwartz formula performed similarly to the height-measured Schwartz in all aspects of equation performance. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric GFR follow-up studies may be possible using height-independent equations. Estimating height from prior height measurements enhances GFR estimation when height is unknown. These findings will hopefully help advance future pediatric renal function database studies.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Estimation of GFR in children from serum creatinine measures in regional databases is limited by a lack of height data. Furthermore, the ability of GFR estimating equations to quantify changes in GFR over time is unknown. Two methods of estimating GFR when height is unknown and the ability of several GFR equations to quantify GFR changes over time were evaluated. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective study included 195 children (mean age 11.9 ± 4.6 years, GFR = 78.8 ± 34.5) who underwent iothalamate GFR, serum creatinine, and height measurements; 93 children underwent a second GFR measurement and 47 a third GFR measurement. Four equations were evaluated for bias and precision and for quantifying GFR change over time: (1) Schwartz, using measured height; (2) Schwartz, using estimated height (based on previous height percentile); (3) a locally derived modification of a previously derived height-independent equation. RESULTS: The Schwartz (measured height) displayed the least bias (-2 to +7%), followed by the modified height-independent equation and Schwartz (estimated height). All equations were imprecise. All equations performed similarly at capturing change in measured GFR over time, with no significant difference between estimated and measured GFR percentage change over time. The height-estimated Schwartz formula performed similarly to the height-measured Schwartz in all aspects of equation performance. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric GFR follow-up studies may be possible using height-independent equations. Estimating height from prior height measurements enhances GFR estimation when height is unknown. These findings will hopefully help advance future pediatric renal function database studies.
Authors: Andre Mattman; Shaun Eintracht; Thomas Mock; Geraldine Schick; David W Seccombe; Robert Morrison Hurley; Colin Thomas White Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-12-21 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson Journal: Adv Data Date: 2000-06-08
Authors: Marie D Philipneri; Lisa A Rocca Rey; Mark A Schnitzler; Kevin C Abbott; Daniel C Brennan; Steven K Takemoto; Paula M Buchanan; Thomas E Burroughs; Lisa M Willoughby; Krista L Lentine Journal: Clin Exp Nephrol Date: 2008-01-05 Impact factor: 2.801
Authors: Alison G Abraham; George J Schwartz; Susan Furth; Bradley A Warady; Alvaro Muñoz Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-09-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: George J Schwartz; Alvaro Muñoz; Michael F Schneider; Robert H Mak; Frederick Kaskel; Bradley A Warady; Susan L Furth Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Fiona Clement; Braden J Manns; Scott Klarenbach; Matthew T James; Pietro Ravani; Neesh Pannu; Sofia B Ahmed; Jennifer MacRae; Nairne Scott-Douglas; Kailash Jindal; Robert Quinn; Bruce F Culleton; Natasha Wiebe; Richard Krause; Laurel Thorlacius; Marcello Tonelli Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2009-10-19 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Kelly R McMahon; Asaf Lebel; Shahrad Rod Rassekh; Kirk R Schultz; Tom D Blydt-Hansen; Geoffrey D E Cuvelier; Cherry Mammen; Maury Pinsk; Bruce C Carleton; Ross T Tsuyuki; Colin J D Ross; Louis Huynh; Mariya Yordanova; Frédérik Crépeau-Hubert; Stella Wang; Ana Palijan; Jasmine Lee; Debbie Boyko; Michael Zappitelli Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2022-10-19 Impact factor: 3.651
Authors: Hans Pottel; Liesbeth Hoste; Laurence Dubourg; Natalie Ebert; Elke Schaeffner; Bjørn Odvar Eriksen; Toralf Melsom; Edmund J Lamb; Andrew D Rule; Stephen T Turner; Richard J Glassock; Vandréa De Souza; Luciano Selistre; Christophe Mariat; Frank Martens; Pierre Delanaye Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 5.992