Literature DB >> 20650985

Validity of spirometry performed online.

J F Masa1, M T González, R Pereira, M Mota, J A Riesco, J Corral, J Zamorano, M Rubio, J Teran, R Farré.   

Abstract

Spirometry is essential for the diagnosis and management of common respiratory diseases. However, its use and quality are low in primary care. An important reason for this is the technical difficulty in performing conventional spirometry. If high-quality spirometry could be performed online, from the pulmonary function laboratory in hospitals, most of the technical problems could be solved. The aim of the present study was to compare spirometries performed online by remote technicians with conventional spirometry. This was a controlled, randomised crossover study of 261 patients referred from primary care centres for pulmonary consultation. They were randomised to undergo either conventional or online spirometry. The technician, located remotely, controlled the spirometer computer. Using a teleconference link, the technician guided the patient through the spirometry. The comparison between conventional and online spirometries was performed on intention to treat and per protocol bases for spirometric values and quality criteria. Agreement between the two spirometric methods was assessed with a Bland-Altman plot. A subpopulation of off-range patients was also characterised. Finally, intra- and interobserver agreement was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. No clinically significant differences were seen between the online and conventional spirometric values in both the intention to treat and per protocol analyses. The agreement in Bland-Altman analysis was poorer for intention to treat than for the per protocol analysis. The latter had a lower percentage of off-range patients and high agreement to determine abnormal spirometry in the off-range group. Conventional spirometry had a higher percentage of patients with spirometric quality criteria although the quality criteria difference was only 5.9%, when both procedures were the first to start. Very good agreement was found between intra- and interobserver reliability. Spirometry performed online from a hospital can be an adequate alternative to conventional spirometry for primary care centres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20650985     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00011510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

1.  Clinical decision support system to enhance quality control of spirometry using information and communication technologies.

Authors:  Felip Burgos; Umberto Melia; Montserrat Vallverdú; Filip Velickovski; Magí Lluch-Ariet; Pere Caminal; Josep Roca
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2014-10-21

2.  Algorithm for automatic forced spirometry quality assessment: technological developments.

Authors:  Umberto Melia; Felip Burgos; Montserrat Vallverdú; Filip Velickovski; Magí Lluch-Ariet; Josep Roca; Pere Caminal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Telemetric detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and investigation of quality of life for people working in shipbuilding industry.

Authors:  Agoritsa Koulouri; Konstantinos Gourgoulianis; Chryssi Hatzoglou; Zoe Roupa
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2014-10-29

4.  Spirometry Outside the Hospital.

Authors:  Mário Morais-Almeida; Miguel T Barbosa; Cláudia S Sousa; Isabel Almeida; Lara Pimenta; Rita Aguiar
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Spirometry Outside the Hospital.

Authors:  Mário Morais-Almeida; Miguel T Barbosa; Cláudia S Sousa; Isabel Almeida; Lara Pimenta; Rita Aguiar
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Assessment and diagnosis of chronic dyspnoea: a literature review.

Authors:  Anthony Paulo Sunjaya; Nusrat Homaira; Kate Corcoran; Allison Martin; Norbert Berend; Christine Jenkins
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.871

7.  Quality Standard Position Statements for Health System Policy Changes in Diagnosis and Management of COPD: A Global Perspective.

Authors:  Mohit Bhutani; David B Price; Tonya A Winders; Heinrich Worth; Kevin Gruffydd-Jones; Ruth Tal-Singer; Jaime Correia-de-Sousa; Mark T Dransfield; Rudi Peché; Daiana Stolz; John R Hurst
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.070

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.