Literature DB >> 20650637

Accounting for velocity of the pivot shift test manoeuvre decreases kinematic variability.

David R Labbe1, Jacques A de Guise, Véronique Godbout, Guy Grimard, David Baillargeon, Patrick Lavigne, Julio Fernandes, Vincent Massé, Pierre Ranger, Nicola Hagemeister.   

Abstract

The pivot shift test is the only clinical test which correlates with knee function following rupture of the ACL. A grade is given to the pivot shift in a subjective manner, leading to efforts to quantify the bone movements and correlate them to the grade. However, the dynamic and unconstrained nature of the manoeuvre introduces important kinematic variability. Our main objective was to develop a method to lessen the variability attributable to clinician technique, therefore increasing inter-grade differences. Three different orthopaedic surgeons each performed the pivot shift test on 12 subjects. Knee joint kinematics were recorded using electromagnetic motion capture devices. Inter-clinician variability was quantified and a method was developed to diminish it, using the angular velocity of flexion. This method was then applied to a larger population composed of 127 knees with various degrees of instability, evaluated by one of eight different orthopaedic surgeons. The clinical grades given by the clinicians were in almost perfect agreement (kappa=0.83). Normalization of kinematic parameters using the angular velocity of knee joint flexion produced by the clinicians reduced the intra-clinician variability by 20%, resulting in an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.52, up from 0.41 before normalization. This allowed for more significant differences between the grades of pivot shift. Simple normalisation of pivot shift kinematics using the angular velocity of flexion reduces clinician-related variability and allows for significant differences between the different grades. These results are an important step towards developing an objective measurement tool for the pivot shift phenomenon.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20650637     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

Review 1.  The KneeKG system: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sébastien Lustig; Robert A Magnussen; Laurence Cheze; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  What does it take to have a high-grade pivot shift?

Authors:  M Tanaka; D Vyas; G Moloney; A Bedi; A D Pearle; V Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Use of a gyroscope sensor to quantify tibial motions during a pivot shift test.

Authors:  Per Henrik Borgstrom; Keith L Markolf; Brock Foster; Frank A Petrigliano; David R McAllister
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Inertial sensors to quantify the pivot shift test in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Alberto Grassi; Federico Raggi; Andrea Visani; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

Review 5.  Quantifying the pivot shift test: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Lopomo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Quantitative pivot shift assessment using combined inertial and magnetic sensing.

Authors:  David R Labbé; Di Li; Guy Grimard; Jacques A de Guise; Nicola Hagemeister
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Assessment of the pivot shift using inertial sensors.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Cecilia Signorelli; Alberto Grassi; Han Yue; Federico Raggi; Francisco Urrizola; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

8.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Residual High-Grade Pivot Shift After ACL Reconstruction With or Without a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.

Authors:  Christophe Jacquet; Charles Pioger; Romain Seil; Raghbir Khakha; Sebastien Parratte; Camille Steltzlen; Jean-Noel Argenson; Nicolas Pujol; Matthieu Ollivier
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.