Literature DB >> 20650485

Is routine renography required after pyeloplasty?

Fayez Almodhen1, Roman Jednak, John-Paul Capolicchio, Waleed Eassa, Alex Brzezinski, Mohamed El-Sherbiny.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed whether renography should be performed routinely following pyeloplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified the records of all patients undergoing pyeloplasty at our hospital between 1989 and 2005. Patients were eligible for the study if they had undergone preoperative ultrasound and renal scan, and postoperative ultrasound and renal scan within 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, respectively. Patients were excluded if they had associated anomalies or high grade reflux. Postoperative downgrading or decompression of the pelvicaliceal dilatation within the same grade was recorded as "improved," while unchanged or worsening hydronephrosis was recorded as "no improvement." All information was obtained from the official radiologist reports rather than from the postoperative surgeon notes. Data obtained from the postoperative renal scan included the presence or absence of obstruction as well as split renal function. We compared postoperative ultrasound and renal scan, as well as changes between preoperative and postoperative split renal function in patients with a normal contralateral kidney. Fisher's exact test was used for comparison.
RESULTS: A total of 97 patients who underwent 101 pyeloplasties at a median age of 18 months were eligible for review. Mean +/- SD followup was 4.5 +/- 2 years. Of the 91 kidneys with improvement on postoperative ultrasound 2 (2%) had an obstructive postoperative renal scan, which spontaneously resolved during followup. In contrast, of the 10 kidneys with postoperative ultrasound showing no improvement 4 (40%) had an obstructive renal scan, of which 2 (50%) required a second procedure (p <0.001). Of the 46 kidneys with downgraded hydronephrosis none had an obstructive postoperative renal scan, compared to 6 of 55 (11%) without downgrading (p <0.03). Of the 49 patients with preoperative split renal function greater than 45% none demonstrated changes of more than 5% postoperatively, compared to 15 of 35 (43%) with split renal function less than 45% (p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom postoperative ultrasound reveals downgrading may not require postoperative renal scan to rule out obstruction. However, those with preoperative function less than 45% may exhibit functional changes greater than 5% that can be determined by postoperative renal scan. 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20650485     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  National Trends in Followup Imaging after Pyeloplasty in Children in the United States.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Thomas S Lendvay; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Trends in followup imaging after adult pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Is decreased diameter of renal pelvis in prone position an indicator of successful pyeloplasty?

Authors:  Gyanendra Sharma; Anshu Sharma; Vivian Yee-Fong Leung; Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

4.  Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Sanjeet Kumar Singh; Sohrab Arora; Varun Mittal; Nitesh Patidar; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka; M S Ansari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

5.  Reflective Practice About Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy in Comparison to Open Surgery for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children Less Than 1 Year of Age.

Authors:  Anthony Kallas-Chemaly; Matthieu Peycelon; Liza Ali; Christine Grapin-Dagorno; Elisabeth Carricaburu; Pascale Philippe-Chomette; Goharig Enezian; Annabel Paye-Jaouen; Alaa El-Ghoneimi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Retroperitoneal Approach for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Encouraging Preliminary Results With Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair.

Authors:  Thomas Blanc; Jules Kohaut; Caroline Elie; Pauline Clermidi; Luca Pio; Caroline Harte; Enrico Brönnimann; Nathalie Botto; Véronique Rousseau; Pascale Sonigo; Christophe Vaessen; Henri Lottmann; Yves Aigrain
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Uretero-Pelvic Junction Stenosis: Considerations on the Appropriate Timing of Correction Based on an Infant Population Treated with a Minimally-Invasive Technique.

Authors:  Mario Lima; Niel Di Salvo; Andrea Portoraro; Michela Maffi; Giovanni Parente; Vincenzo Davide Catania; Tommaso Gargano
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04

8.  Renal Cortical Thickness After Pyeloplasty in Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Virote Chalieopanyarwong; Worapat Attawettayanon
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-09-09

9.  Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study.

Authors:  Thomas Blanc; Olivier Abbo; Fabrizio Vatta; Julien Grosman; Fabienne Marquant; Caroline Elie; Mélodie Juricic; Samia Laraqui; Aline Broch; Alexis Arnaud
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-15

10.  Functional evaluation before stone surgery: Is it mandatory?

Authors:  Rishi Nayyar; Nikhil Khattar; Rajeev Sood
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.