Literature DB >> 20647949

Acute effects of two different stretching methods on local muscular endurance performance.

Thiago M Gomes1, Roberto Simão, Mario C Marques, Pablo B Costa, Jefferson da Silva Novaes.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the acute effects of the static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching methods on local muscular endurance performance at intensities between 40 and 80% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for the knee extension (KE) and bench press (BP) exercises. Fifteen male volunteers (23.9 ± 4.3 years; 174.5 ± 8.5 cm; and 77.8 ± 7.6 kg), who were nonathletes but had previous experience in resistance training, volunteered for this study. Participants were assigned to 9 randomly ordered experimental conditions, in which all subjects performed endurance tests at 40, 60, and 80% of 1RM, preceded by static stretching (SS), PNF, and no stretching (NS) in the KE and BP exercises. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (NS × SS × PNF) revealed an influence of stretching for all intensities only when the PNF treatment was used. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in the KE exercise, with reductions in the number of repetitions when comparing PNF40 (23.7 ± 2.7) to NS40 (27.5 ± 3.6); PNF60 (12.6 ± 2.8) to SS60 (16.5 ± 4.1) and NS60 (17.3 ± 3.2); and PNF80 (6.3 ± 1.7) to SS80 (9.9 ± 2.5) and NS80 (9.8 ± 2.3) conditions. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were also found for the BP exercise with decreases in the number of repetitions when comparing PNF60 (13.7 ± 2.8) to NS60 (17.0 ± 3.0) and PNF80 (6.2 ± 2.2) to NS80 (8.7 ± 2.3) conditions. These findings suggest that for the intensities studied (40, 60, and 80% 1RM), only the PNF method decreased muscle endurance. Strength and conditioning professionals may want to consider avoiding PNF stretching before activities requiring local muscular endurance performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20647949     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc236a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  MAXIMUM REPETITION PERFORMANCE AFTER DIFFERENT ANTAGONIST FOAM ROLLING VOLUMES IN THE INTER-SET REST PERIOD.

Authors:  Estêvão Rios Monteiro; Jakob Škarabot; Andrew D Vigotsky; Amanda Fernandes Brown; Thiago Matassoli Gomes; Jefferson da Silva Novaes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-02

2.  Effect of the flexibility training performed immediately before resistance training on muscle hypertrophy, maximum strength and flexibility.

Authors:  Roberto Moriggi Junior; Ricardo Berton; Thiago Mattos Frota de Souza; Mara Patrícia Traina Chacon-Mikahil; Cláudia Regina Cavaglieri
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Acute effects of different stretching techniques on the number of repetitions in a single lower body resistance training session.

Authors:  Marcos A Sá; Gabriel R Neto; Pablo B Costa; Thiago M Gomes; Cláudio M Bentes; Amanda F Brown; Jefferson S Novaes
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Effects of Static Stretching on Squat Performance in Division I Female Athletes.

Authors:  Clare F Heisey; J Derek Kingsley
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

5.  Influence of inter-set stretching on strength, flexibility and hormonal adaptations.

Authors:  Antônio Claudio Souza; Claudio Melibeu Bentes; Belmiro Freitas de Salles; Victor Machado Reis; José Vilaça Alves; Humberto Miranda; Jefferson da Silva Novaes
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.193

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.