Literature DB >> 20647926

Thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of patterns and prognostic factors for recurrence.

Iain G Thomson1, Bernard M Smithers, David C Gotley, Ian Martin, Janine M Thomas, Peter O'Rourke, Andrew P Barbour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors report the recurrence pattern of esophageal cancer after thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy (TAE), comparing it to the recurrence pattern after open surgery and identify prognostic factors for recurrence. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To improve long-term survival for esophageal cancer radical surgery has been proposed increasingly, however, recurrent disease remains a problem. Opinion is divided as to the adequacy of resection possible using minimally invasive techniques with concerns that there may be an increased incidence in locoregional recurrence.
METHODS: A total of 221 patients who underwent esophagectomy at the Princess Alexandra Hospital without any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were identified from a prospective database. Patients were followed up for the detection of symptomatic recurrence for a median of 59 months.
RESULTS: Within this group 165 patients underwent TAE and 56 an open transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). The 5-year overall recurrence rate was 133/221 (60%). The 5-year rates of symptomatic first recurrence following TAE was 4%, 9%, and 47% for local, regional, and distant recurrence, respectively. The 5-year rates of symptomatic first recurrence following TTE was 5%, 18%, and 55% for local, regional, and distant recurrence, respectively. Operative approach was not a prognostic factor for any type of recurrence. Independent prognostic factors associated with locoregional recurrence were positive margins and number of positive nodes. Distant recurrence was associated with T stage, differentiation, tumor length >6 cm, and number of positive nodes.
CONCLUSION: Distant recurrence remains a significant problem in esophageal cancer. TAE achieved adequate locoregional control and compared favorably with open TTE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647926     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e909a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?

Authors:  Lesley Uttley; Fiona Campbell; Michael Rhodes; Anna Cantrell; Heather Stegenga; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Middle and lower esophagectomy preceded by hand-assisted laparoscopic transhiatal approach for distal esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Hirotaka Konishi; Ryo Morimura; Shuhei Komatsu; Yasutoshi Murayama; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Hisashi Ikoma; Takeshi Kubota; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Daisuke Ichikawa; Kazuma Okamoto; Chouhei Sakakura; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-17

Review 3.  Current Status and Future Prospects for Esophageal Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Makoto Sohda; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 1.520

4.  Recurrence patterns and risk factors following thoracoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Itasu Ninomiya; Koichi Okamoto; Tomoya Tsukada; Jun Kinoshita; Katsunobu Oyama; Sachio Fushida; Harushi Osugi; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-25

5.  Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Juha Kauppi; Jari Räsänen; Eero Sihvo; Riikka Huuhtanen; Kaisa Nelskylä; Jarmo Salo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outcomes following laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J Christian Cash; Joerg Zehetner; Bobak Hedayati; Nikolai A Bildzukewicz; Namir Katkhouda; Rodney J Mason; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Robotic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Brett Broussard; John Evans; Benjamin Wei; Robert Cerfolio
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-08-10

8.  Outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position with laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Tsutomu Namikawa; Masaya Munekage; Kazune Fujisawa; Eri Munekgae; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Chien-Sheng Huang; Yu-Chung Wu; Teh-Ying Chou; Wen-Hu Hsu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Survival benefit of multimodal local therapy for repeat recurrence of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Itasu Ninomiya; Koichi Okamoto; Sachio Fushida; Jun Kinoshita; Hiroyuki Takamura; Hidehiro Tajima; Isamu Makino; Tomoharu Miyashita; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.