Literature DB >> 20647526

Do CSF biomarkers help clinicians predict the progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia?

Alex J Mitchell1, J A Monge-Argilés, J Sánchez-Paya.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the value of CSF biomarkers to predict those individuals with mild cognitive impairment who will progress to dementia. However, lumbar puncture is not routine in these patients and biomarker assays are not universally available. To change clinical practice there must be very good evidence that biomarkers are helpful over and above clinical impression. Here we discuss the merits of CSF biomarkers compared with clinicians using simple bedside cognitive tests. Although every biomarker has a superior positive predictive value, most have inferior negative predictive values. When predicting the progression of mild cognitive impairment, the overall misclassification rate by clinicians using bedside cognitive tests is approximately 38% but this could be reduced to approximately 30% by using Abeta1-42 and to 24% with phosphorylated tau or total tau (or a combination of CSF biomarkers). Clinicians and patients together should decide whether this is sufficient to warrant the additional burden of a lumbar puncture, and the cost of the test, or whether further studies are needed before useful and clinically practical conclusions can be reached.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647526     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.217778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Neurol        ISSN: 1474-7758


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Gothenburg MCI study: Design and distribution of Alzheimer's disease and subcortical vascular disease diagnoses from baseline to 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  Anders Wallin; Arto Nordlund; Michael Jonsson; Karin Lind; Åke Edman; Mattias Göthlin; Jacob Stålhammar; Marie Eckerström; Silke Kern; Anne Börjesson-Hanson; Mårten Carlsson; Erik Olsson; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Johan Svensson; Annika Öhrfelt; Maria Bjerke; Sindre Rolstad; Carl Eckerström
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Self-rated and informant-rated everyday function in comparison to objective markers of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Alicia D Rueda; Karen M Lau; Naomi Saito; Danielle Harvey; Shannon L Risacher; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Cerebral microbleeds in early Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  T Poliakova; O Levin; A Arablinskiy; E Vasenina; I Zerr
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Impact of early intervention and disease modification in patients with predementia Alzheimer's disease: a Markov model simulation.

Authors:  David Budd; Leah C Burns; Zhenchao Guo; Gilbert L'italien; Pablo Lapuerta
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-10-07

Review 5.  Meta-Review of CSF Core Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease: The State-of-the-Art after the New Revised Diagnostic Criteria.

Authors:  Daniel Ferreira; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Eric Westman; Lars-Olof Wahlund; Antonio Sarría; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  A score based on screening tests to differentiate mild cognitive impairment from subjective memory complaints.

Authors:  Fábio Henrique de Gobbi Porto; Lívia Spíndola; Maira Okada de Oliveira; Patrícia Helena Figuerêdo do Vale; Marco Orsini; Ricardo Nitrini; Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2013-09-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.