BACKGROUND:Cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids have been the cornerstone of remission-induction therapy for severe antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis for 40 years. Uncontrolled studies suggest that rituximab is effective and may be safer than a cyclophosphamide-based regimen. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial of rituximab (375 mg per square meter of body-surface area per week for 4 weeks) as compared with cyclophosphamide (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) for remission induction. Glucocorticoids were tapered off; the primary end point was remission of disease without the use of prednisone at 6 months. RESULTS:Nine centers enrolled 197 ANCA-positive patients with either Wegener's granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis. Baseline disease activity, organ involvement, and the proportion of patients with relapsing disease were similar in the two treatment groups. Sixty-three patients in the rituximab group (64%) reached the primary end point, as compared with 52 patients in the control group (53%), a result that met the criterion for noninferiority (P<0.001). The rituximab-based regimen was more efficacious than the cyclophosphamide-based regimen for inducing remission of relapsing disease; 34 of 51 patients in the rituximab group (67%) as compared with 21 of 50 patients in the control group (42%) reached the primary end point (P=0.01). Rituximab was also as effective as cyclophosphamide in the treatment of patients with major renal disease or alveolar hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups with respect to rates of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS:Rituximab therapy was not inferior to daily cyclophosphamide treatment for induction of remission in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis and may be superior in relapsing disease. (Funded by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Genentech, and Biogen; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00104299.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids have been the cornerstone of remission-induction therapy for severe antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis for 40 years. Uncontrolled studies suggest that rituximab is effective and may be safer than a cyclophosphamide-based regimen. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial of rituximab (375 mg per square meter of body-surface area per week for 4 weeks) as compared with cyclophosphamide (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) for remission induction. Glucocorticoids were tapered off; the primary end point was remission of disease without the use of prednisone at 6 months. RESULTS: Nine centers enrolled 197 ANCA-positive patients with either Wegener's granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis. Baseline disease activity, organ involvement, and the proportion of patients with relapsing disease were similar in the two treatment groups. Sixty-three patients in the rituximab group (64%) reached the primary end point, as compared with 52 patients in the control group (53%), a result that met the criterion for noninferiority (P<0.001). The rituximab-based regimen was more efficacious than the cyclophosphamide-based regimen for inducing remission of relapsing disease; 34 of 51 patients in the rituximab group (67%) as compared with 21 of 50 patients in the control group (42%) reached the primary end point (P=0.01). Rituximab was also as effective as cyclophosphamide in the treatment of patients with major renal disease or alveolar hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups with respect to rates of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS:Rituximab therapy was not inferior to daily cyclophosphamide treatment for induction of remission in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis and may be superior in relapsing disease. (Funded by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Genentech, and Biogen; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00104299.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: J H Stone; G S Hoffman; P A Merkel; Y I Min; M L Uhlfelder; D B Hellmann; U Specks; N B Allen; J C Davis; R F Spiera; L H Calabrese; F M Wigley; N Maiden; R M Valente; J L Niles; K H Fye; J W McCune; E W St Clair; R A Luqmani Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2001-04
Authors: J C Jennette; R J Falk; K Andrassy; P A Bacon; J Churg; W L Gross; E C Hagen; G S Hoffman; G G Hunder; C G Kallenberg Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1994-02
Authors: Kirsten de Groot; Lorraine Harper; David R W Jayne; Luis Felipe Flores Suarez; Gina Gregorini; Wolfgang L Gross; Rashid Luqmani; Charles D Pusey; Niels Rasmussen; Renato A Sinico; Vladimir Tesar; Philippe Vanhille; Kerstin Westman; Caroline O S Savage Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Christian Pagnoux; Alfred Mahr; Mohamed A Hamidou; Jean-Jacques Boffa; Marc Ruivard; Jean-Pierre Ducroix; Xavier Kyndt; François Lifermann; Thomas Papo; Marc Lambert; José Le Noach; Mehdi Khellaf; Dominique Merrien; Xavier Puéchal; Stéphane Vinzio; Pascal Cohen; Luc Mouthon; Jean-François Cordier; Loïc Guillevin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christian Pagnoux; Susan L Hogan; Hyunsook Chin; J Charles Jennette; Ronald J Falk; Loïc Guillevin; Patrick H Nachman Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-09
Authors: Javier D Finkielman; Augustine S Lee; Amber M Hummel; Margaret A Viss; Gregory L Jacob; Henry A Homburger; Tobias Peikert; Gary S Hoffman; Peter A Merkel; Robert Spiera; E William St Clair; John C Davis; W Joseph McCune; Andrea K Tibbs; Steven R Ytterberg; John H Stone; Ulrich Specks Journal: Am J Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Marcia A Friedman; Dongseok Choi; Stephen R Planck; James T Rosenbaum; Cailin H Sibley Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Andrew M Harrison; Nassir M Thalji; Alexandra J Greenberg; Carmen J Tapia; Anthony J Windebank Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 4.689