Literature DB >> 20647134

Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to bone-conducted vibration in superior vestibular neuritis show utricular function.

Leonardo Manzari1, Annarita Tedesco, Ann M Burgess, Ian S Curthoys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the first negative component (n10) of the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) to bone-conducted vibration (BCV) is due primarily to activation of the utricular macula. STUDY
DESIGN: The n10 was recorded in response to brief BCV at the midline of the forehead at the hairline (Fz). If the n10 is due primarily to utricular activation, then diseases that affect only the superior division of the vestibular nerve in which all utricular afferents course (i.e., superior vestibular neuritis [SVN]) should reduce or eliminate n10 beneath the contralesional eye, whereas the n10 beneath the ipsilesional eye and the sacculo-collic cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) on the ipsilesional side should be preserved.
SETTING: A prospective study at a tertiary neurotological referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The n10 component of the oVEMP was measured in 133 patients with unilateral SVN but with inferior vestibular nerve function preserved, as shown by ipsilesional cVEMPs.
RESULTS: The n10 to Fz BCV of 133 SVN patients was reduced beneath the contralesional eye relative to the ipsilesional eye so that there was an n10 asymmetry that was significantly greater than the n10 asymmetry in the 50 healthy subjects. In terms of predicting the affected side (shown by canal paresis), using an n10 asymmetry ratio (asymmetry ratio for the relative size of the n10 of the oVEMPs for the two eyes [AR]) of 46.5 percent, the n10 AR has a diagnostic accuracy of 94 percent.
CONCLUSION: The n10 component of the oVEMP to BCV is probably mediated by the superior vestibular nerve and so mainly by the utricular receptors. The n10 AR is almost as good as canal paresis in identifying the affected side in patients. Copyright (c) 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647134     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  26 in total

1.  Can vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials help differentiate Ménière disease from vestibular migraine?

Authors:  M Geraldine Zuniga; Kristen L Janky; Michael C Schubert; John P Carey
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  [Recording cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Part 2: influencing factors, evaluation of findings and clinical significance].

Authors:  L E Walther; K Hörmann; O Pfaar
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials eliciting: an overview.

Authors:  Anna Eleftheriadou; Eleftherios Koudounarakis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Dissociation between cVEMP and oVEMP responses: different vestibular origins of each VEMP?

Authors:  Leonardo Manzari; Ann M Burgess; Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Objective measures of vestibular function during an acute vertigo attack in a very young child.

Authors:  L Manzari; A M Burgess; H G Macdougall; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Vestibular function in Lermoyez syndrome at attack.

Authors:  Leonardo Manzari; Ann M Burgess; Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Is it possible to measure peripheral vestibular function in a patient with congenital nystagmus?

Authors:  L Manzari; A M Burgess; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Clinical utility of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs).

Authors:  Konrad P Weber; Sally M Rosengren
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Optimizing ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing for superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: electrode placement.

Authors:  M Geraldine Zuniga; Marcela Davalos-Bichara; Michael C Schubert; John P Carey; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Air-conducted oVEMPs provide the best separation between intact and superior canal dehiscent labyrinths.

Authors:  Kristen L Janky; Kimanh D Nguyen; Miriam Welgampola; M Geraldine Zuniga; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.