Literature DB >> 20647083

Postoperative pain after the application of two different irrigation devices in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Eudes Gondim1, Frank C Setzer, Carla Bertelli Dos Carmo, Syngcuk Kim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The extrusion of irrigation solutions beyond the apical constriction may result in postoperative pain. Sodium hypochlorite can cause severe tissue irritation and necrosis outside the root canal system if extruded into the periodontal ligament (PDL) space. Different delivery techniques were discussed to reduce this potential risk. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative level of pain after root canal therapy using either endodontic needle irrigation or a negative apical pressure device.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized clinical trial, 110 asymptomatic single-rooted anterior and premolar teeth were treated endodontically with two different irrigation techniques. The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups. In the MP group (n = 55), procedures were performed using an endodontic irrigating syringe (Max-i-Probe; Dentsply Rinn, Elgin, IL). The EV group (n = 55) used an irrigation device based on negative apical pressure (EndoVac; Discus Dental, Culver City, CA). Postoperatively, the patients were prescribed ibuprofen 200 mg to take every 8 hours if required. Pain levels were assessed by an analog scale questionnaire after 4, 24, and 48 hours. The amount of ibuprofen taken was recorded at the same time intervals.
RESULTS: During the 0- to 4-, 4- to 24-, and 24- to 48-hour intervals after treatment, the pain experience with the negative apical pressure device was significantly lower than when using the needle irrigation (p < 0.0001 [4, 24, 48 hours]). Between 0 and 4 and 4 and 24 hours, the intake of analgesics was significantly lower in the group treated by the negative apical pressure device (p < 0.0001 [0-4 hours], p = 0.001 [4-24 hours]). The difference for the 24- to 48-hour period was not statistically different (p = 0.08). The Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a strongly positive and significant relationship for the MP group (r = 0.851, p < 0.001) and the EV group (r = 0.596, p < 0.0001) between pain intensity and the amount of analgesics.
CONCLUSION: The outcome of this investigation indicates that the use of a negative apical pressure irrigation device can result in a significant reduction of postoperative pain levels in comparison to conventional needle irrigation. Copyright 2010 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647083     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  23 in total

Review 1.  Pressure alteration techniques in endodontics- a review of literature.

Authors:  Shinam Kapila Pasricha; Sameer Makkar; Pranav Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  Tissue response to root canal irrigation systems in dogs' teeth with apical periodontitis.

Authors:  Nestor Cohenca; Priscilla Coutinho Romualdo; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva; Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva; Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz; Andiara De Rossi; Paulo Nelson-Filho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Pain after single-visit root canal treatment with two single-file systems based on different kinematics--a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Prasanna Neelakantan; Subash Sharma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Instrumentation Using ProTaper Next or Reciproc in Asymptomatic Molars: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Patrícia Santos Oliveira; Meire Coelho Ferreira; Natália Gomes Nascimento Paula; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Renata Grazziotin-Soares; Gisele Rodrigues da Silva; Helena Cristina Santos da Mata; José Bauer; Ceci Nunes Carvalho
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Postoperative pain after SWEEPS, PIPS, sonic and ultrasonic-assisted irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Erhan Erkan; Mustafa Gündoğar; Gülşah Uslu; Taha Özyürek
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.885

6.  Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Ali Shokraneh; Majid Ajami; Nastaran Farhadi; Mohsen Hosseini; Bita Rohani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  The effect of sonic activation of irrigant on postoperative pain after root canal treatment in primary molar teeth: a randomized, clinical study.

Authors:  Hüsniye Gümüş; Ebru Delikan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Postoperative pain after one-visit root-canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: comparison of three different obturation techniques.

Authors:  Luis-O Alonso-Ezpeleta; Carmen Gasco-Garcia; Lizett Castellanos-Cosano; Jenifer Martín-González; Francsico-J López-Frías; Juan-J Segura-Egea
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-07-01

9.  Influence of root canal instrumentation and obturation techniques on intra-operative pain during endodontic therapy.

Authors:  Jenifer Martín-González; Marta Echevarría-Pérez; Benito Sánchez-Domínguez; Maria-Luisa Tarilonte-Delgado; Lizett Castellanos-Cosano; Francisco-Javier López-Frías; Juan-Jose Segura-Egea
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-09-01

10.  Effect of calcium hydroxide mixed with lidocaine hydrochloride on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis: a preliminary randomized controlled prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Hakan Arslan; Ezgi Doğanay Yıldız; Hüseyin Sinan Topçuoğlu; Ebru Tepecik; Gizem Taş
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.