| Literature DB >> 20646956 |
Anna Franz1, Ortwin Adams, Rhea Willems, Linda Bonzel, Nicole Neuhausen, Susanne Schweizer-Krantz, Jens U Ruggeberg, Reinhart Willers, Birgit Henrich, Horst Schroten, Tobias Tenenbaum.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of viral load and co-infections in children with respiratory infections is not clear.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20646956 PMCID: PMC7185496 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.05.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Virol ISSN: 1386-6532 Impact factor: 3.168
Fig. 1Virus distribution in the nasopharyngeal aspirates. Virus distribution in the first nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) (A) and in the second NPA (B).
Single and co-infections with respiratory viruses.
| Virus | Infections total | Single infections (number) | Co-infections (number) | Co-infections (%) | Influenza A | Influenza B | Parainfluenza | RSV | HMPV | Corona 229 E | Corona OC43 | Corona NL63 | Rhinovirus | Enterovirus | Adenovirus | HBoV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSV | 160 | 131 | 29 | 18,1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 14 | |||||
| HMPV | 16 | 14 | 2 | 12,5 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Influenza A | 9 | 8 | 1 | 11,1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Influenza B | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0,0 | ||||||||||||
| Parainfluenza | 20 | 15 | 5 | 25,0 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Corona 229E | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100,0 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Corona OC43 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100,0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Corona NL63 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50,0 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Rhinovirus | 87 | 57 | 30 | 34,5 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 5 | |||||
| Adenovirus | 28 | 9 | 19 | 67,9 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||
| HBoV | 28 | 9 | 19 | 67,9 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||
| Enterovirus | 18 | 2 | 16 | 88,9 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 3 |
No viral co-infections between Influenza A, Influenza B, Parainfluenza, RSV, and HMPV occurred.
Comparisons of clinical characteristics among patients with RSV, rhinovirus, human bocavirus (HBoV) and adenovirus single infections, and RSV, rhinovirus, HBoV and adenovirus co-infections with other respiratory viruses.
| RSV single | Rhino single | HBoV single | Adenovirus single | RSV co-infection | Rhinovirus co-infection | HBoV co-infection | Adenovirus co-infection | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 131 | 57 | 9 | 9 | 29 | 30 | 19 | 19 | |
| Age (years, median) | 0.5a,b | 1.4a | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.8b | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| Male (%) | 68 (52)a | 39 (68)a | 5 (55) | 8 (89) | 19 (66) | 16 (53) | 12 (63) | 13 (68) |
| Pneumonia (%) | 38 (29)b | 18 (32) | 7 (78) | 7 (78) | 15 (52)b | 10 (33) | 10 (53) | 10 (53) |
| Supplemental O2 (%) | 56 (43) | 18 (32) | 2 (22) | 2 (22) | 12 (41) | 15 (50) | 7 (37) | 5 (26) |
| Antibiotics (%) | 53 (40)b | 21 (37) | 7 (78) | 8 (89) | 20 (69)b | 12 (40) | 6 (32) | 9 (47) |
| Bronchodilators (%) | 112 (85) | 52 (91) | 8 (89) | 3 (33) | 26 (90) | 27 (90) | 18 (95) | 16 (84) |
| Systemic corticosteroids (%) | 25 (19)a | 21 (37)a | 1 (11) | 2 (22) | 6 (21) | 11 (37) | 12 (63) | 9 (47) |
| Chest radiography (%) | 53 (40) | 28 (49) | 7 (78) | 8 (89) | 16 (55) | 15 (50) | 12 (63) | 13 (68) |
| Fever (≥38.5̊C) (%) | 50 (38)b | 21 (37) | 6 (67) | 7 (78) | 20 (69)b | 11 (37) | 12 (63) | 10 (53) |
| CRP ≥5 mg/dl | 12 (9) | 9 (16) | 4 (44) | 4 (44) | 4 (14) | 1 (3) | 2 (1) | 2 (1) |
| Leucocytosis (%) | 28 (21)a,b | 26 (46)a | 5 (55) | 4 (44) | 14 (48)b | 20 (67) | 8 (42) | 10 (53) |
| DOH (days, median) | 5a | 4a | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
Other respiratory viruses were:
ap < .05, Rhino single vs. RSV single infections.
bp < .05, RSV-co-infection vs. RSV single infections.
Clinical characteristics did not differ significantly in HBoV and adenovirus single and co-infections.
Abbreviations: DOH: days of hospitalization and N: number.
Fig. 2Viral load of respiratory viruses drops in the course of viral single- and co-infections. The figure shows the differences of viral load of paired 1 and 2. NPAs in viral single (A) and co-infections (B).
Fig. 3Viral load of respiratory viruses is lower in viral co-infections compared to single infections.
Fig. 4Pathogen distribution in bacterial cultures from nasopharyngeal aspirates. Pathogen distribution in all bacterial cultures from all 1. NPAs (A), pathogen distribution of positive bacterial cultures with the result “abundant pathogenic bacteria” in virus positive samples of the 1. NPAs (n = 97) (B) and from virus negative 1. NPAs (C) (n = 15).
Fig. 5Predominance of Haemophilus influenzae in RSV and rhinovirus single infections, and Moraxellacatharralis in RSV and rhinovirus co-infections. Distribution of the most frequently detected bacteria in bacterial cultures from the 1. NPA with the semiquantitative result “abundant pathogenic bacteria” in all RSV (A) respectively rhinovirus (B) single infections and co-infections.