PURPOSE: Mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock (SS/SS) remains high. Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines were published in 2004 with the goal of improving outcomes in SS/SS. We tested the hypothesis that adherence to SSC guidelines and management of patients with SS/SS were influenced by physician specialty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was mailed to 4998 randomly selected physicians, 1666 each for emergency medicine (EM), critical care medicine (CCM), and internal medicine (IM) from the American Medical Association database. Demographics, compliance with SSC guidelines, and approaches to management of patients with SS/SS were analyzed by specialty. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-nine respondents were included for final analysis. There were no differences between 3 specialties in obtaining blood cultures and in administering intravenous fluids, pressors, and antibiotics. The CCM physicians were more likely to measure serum lactate and central venous pressure, use corticosteroids and drotrecogin α, and aim for normoglycemia and plateau pressures less than 30 cm H(2)O in mechanically ventilated patients (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We observe that adherence with SSC guidelines continues to be a challenge for CCM, IM, and EM physicians. Significant differences in management of SS/SS exist for the 3 specialties. Because guideline implementation impacts patient outcomes, further evaluation of these differences is warranted.
PURPOSE: Mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock (SS/SS) remains high. Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines were published in 2004 with the goal of improving outcomes in SS/SS. We tested the hypothesis that adherence to SSC guidelines and management of patients with SS/SS were influenced by physician specialty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was mailed to 4998 randomly selected physicians, 1666 each for emergency medicine (EM), critical care medicine (CCM), and internal medicine (IM) from the American Medical Association database. Demographics, compliance with SSC guidelines, and approaches to management of patients with SS/SS were analyzed by specialty. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-nine respondents were included for final analysis. There were no differences between 3 specialties in obtaining blood cultures and in administering intravenous fluids, pressors, and antibiotics. The CCM physicians were more likely to measure serum lactate and central venous pressure, use corticosteroids and drotrecogin α, and aim for normoglycemia and plateau pressures less than 30 cm H(2)O in mechanically ventilated patients (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We observe that adherence with SSC guidelines continues to be a challenge for CCM, IM, and EM physicians. Significant differences in management of SS/SS exist for the 3 specialties. Because guideline implementation impacts patient outcomes, further evaluation of these differences is warranted.
Authors: Ithan D Peltan; Kristina H Mitchell; Kristina E Rudd; Blake A Mann; David J Carlbom; Catherine L Hough; Thomas D Rea; Samuel M Brown Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Gabriel Wardi; Ian Joel; Julian Villar; Michael Lava; Eric Gross; Vaishal Tolia; Raghu R Seethala; Robert L Owens; Rebecca E Sell; Sydney B Montesi; Farbod N Rahaghi; Somnath Bose; Ashish Rai; Elizabeth K Stevenson; Jakob McSparron; Vaishal Tolia; Jeremy R Beitler Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-08-25 Impact factor: 2.889
Authors: Melanie Meersch; Christoph Schmidt; Andreas Hoffmeier; Hugo Van Aken; Carola Wempe; Joachim Gerss; Alexander Zarbock Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-01-21 Impact factor: 17.440