Literature DB >> 20646799

Wikipedia as an evidence source for nursing and healthcare students.

Carol A Haigh1.   

Abstract

Where students once were confined to the University library, they are now at liberty to wander through cyber-space at will. There is evidence to suggest that student have been very quick to exploit the opportunities that the Internet can offer them. Students frequently cited search engines such as Google and Web 2.0 information sharing sites such as Wikipedia as the first places they look when seeking information for an assignment. Although a number of disciplines have accepted that Wikipedia can be viewed as an accurate and legitimate evidence source nurse educators tend to view Wikipedia with a degree of suspicion. The purpose of this paper is to carry out an exploratory study of health and health related content on a sample of Wikipedia site with the overall intention of assessing the quality of their source and supporting information. A 10% sample of health related Wikipedia entries were evaluated, with a total of 2598 references assessed. In total 1473 (56%) of the references citied on the Wikipedia pages reviewed could be argued to come from clearly identifiable reputable sources. This translates to a mean number of reputable sources of M=29 per Wikipedia entry. The quality of the evidence taken obtained from the 2500 plus references from over 50 Wikipedia pages was of sufficiently sound quality to suggest that, for health related entries, Wikipedia is appropriate for use by nursing students.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20646799     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  16 in total

1.  Should doctors spurn Wikipedia?

Authors:  David Metcalfe; John Powell
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Analysis of reference sources used in drug-related Wikipedia articles.

Authors:  Laura Koppen; Jennifer Phillips; Renee Papageorgiou
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2015-07

3.  Mining consumer health vocabulary from community-generated text.

Authors:  V G Vinod Vydiswaran; Qiaozhu Mei; David A Hanauer; Kai Zheng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

4.  Evaluating the appropriateness of electronic information resources for learning.

Authors:  Dinara Saparova; Nathanial S Nolan
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-01

5.  Topic pages: PLoS Computational Biology meets Wikipedia.

Authors:  Shoshana J Wodak; Daniel Mietchen; Andrew M Collings; Robert B Russell; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion.

Authors:  James M Heilman; Eckhard Kemmann; Michael Bonert; Anwesh Chatterjee; Brent Ragar; Graham M Beards; David J Iberri; Matthew Harvey; Brendan Thomas; Wouter Stomp; Michael F Martone; Daniel J Lodge; Andrea Vondracek; Jacob F de Wolff; Casimir Liber; Samir C Grover; Tim J Vickers; Bertalan Meskó; Michaël R Laurent
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  An online expert network for high quality information on occupational safety and health: cross-sectional study of user satisfaction and impact.

Authors:  Martijn D F Rhebergen; Annet F Lenderink; Frank J H van Dijk; Carel T J Hulshof
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Comparing the use of an online expert health network against common information sources to answer health questions.

Authors:  Martijn D F Rhebergen; Annet F Lenderink; Frank J H van Dijk; Carel T J Hulshof
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature.

Authors:  M Dylan Bould; Emily S Hladkowicz; Ashlee-Ann E Pigford; Lee-Anne Ufholz; Tatyana Postonogova; Eunkyung Shin; Sylvain Boet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-03-06

10.  Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Nourah M AlSwaidan; Lama A Alshwairikh; Jumana M AlShammari
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.