Literature DB >> 20646719

Stone size is only independent predictor of shock wave lithotripsy success in children: a community experience.

Sean McAdams1, Nicholas Kim, Indupur R Ravish, Manoj Monga, Roland Ugarte, Rajendra Nerli, Aseem R Shukla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined whether age, gender, body mass index, number of stones, stone location or total stone diameter could independently predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 149 patients 3 to 17 years old undergoing shock wave lithotripsy between 2001 and 2008. Cases were retrieved from a regional shock wave lithotripsy database. Variables analyzed included age, gender, body mass index, number of shocks delivered, stone location, number of stones and total stone diameter. Stone-free status on followup imaging at 2 weeks to 3 months was considered a successful outcome.
RESULTS: Of 149 patients 32 had multiple stones. After shock wave lithotripsy 106 patients (71%) were stone-free, 12 (8%) required a repeat procedure and 31 (21%) had residual fragments. Number of stones per patient ranged from 1 to 18 (mean +/- SD 2.14 +/- 2.60). Mean +/- SD number of stones was 1.87 +/- 2.42 in successfully treated patients and 2.81 +/- 2.92 in those with treatment failure (p = 0.065). Total stone diameter ranged from 2 to 90 mm (mean +/- SD 14.03 +/- 16.68). Mean total stone diameter was 11.1 +/- 13.4 mm in successfully treated patients and 21.3 +/- 21.4 mm in those with treatment failure (p <0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge we present the first multi-institutional cohort study in children demonstrating no significant relationship between successful outcome and patient age, gender, body mass index, stone location or number of stones. Only total stone diameter independently predicted shock wave lithotripsy success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20646719     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Current and practice-relevant news from pediatric urology].

Authors:  R Stein; A Schröder; M Goepel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Novel cystine ester mimics for the treatment of cystinuria-induced urolithiasis in a knockout mouse model.

Authors:  Amrik Sahota; Jaspreet S Parihar; Kathleen M Capaccione; Min Yang; Kelsey Noll; Derek Gordon; David Reimer; Ill Yang; Brian T Buckley; Marianne Polunas; Kenneth R Reuhl; Matthew R Lewis; Michael D Ward; David S Goldfarb; Jay A Tischfield
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Predicting successful outcomes.

Authors:  Sean McAdams; Aseem R Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-10

4.  Is There A Difference Between Presence of Single Stone And Multiple Stones in Flexible Ureterorenoscopy And Laser Lithotripsy For Renal Stone Burden < 300mm2 ?

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Onur Kucuktopcu; Burak Ucpinar; Zafer Gokhan Gurbuz; Omer Sarilar; Ahmet Yalcin Berberoglu; Murat Baykal; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Combined Therapy in Children: Efficacy and Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Laura Burgos Lucena; Beatriz Fernández Bautista; Alberto Parente Hernández; Ruben Ortiz Rodríguez; Jose María Angulo Madero
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.418

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.