Literature DB >> 20646685

Demographic age shift toward later conception results in an increased age in the subfertile population and an increased demand for medical care.

Aisha A de Graaff1, Jolande A Land, Alfons G H Kessels, Johannes L H Evers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the nationwide age shift toward later conception on the corresponding subfertile population.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: General population, the Netherlands. Subfertile population, Maastricht University Medical Centre. PATIENT(S): Women delivering their first child, women entering fertility care. INTERVENTION(S): Between 1985 and 2008 the age of women at their first visit to our fertility clinic was recorded prospectively. Data concerning the general population were extracted from the database of Statistics Netherlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Age shift in women's mean age at first fertility presentation; correlation age shift of general population and subfertile population; age-related ratio of number of women attending our fertility clinic compared with nationwide number of women delivering a first child. RESULT(S): We found a 3.7-year increase in age at first fertility presentation during the study period. For each year of increase in age at first delivery we found a 1.10-year increase in age of women entering fertility care (R=0.93). The ratio between the number of new subfertility patients and the number of women delivering their first child stratified per age was calculated. With the ratio set to 1 at the age of 25 years, the ratio was 2.5 at age 35 years and 6.5 at age 40 years. CONCLUSION(S): The demographic age shift toward later conception is accompanied by an increased age in the subfertile population and by an increased demand for medical care.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20646685     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs.

Authors:  J C Daniluk; E Koert
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Birth defects and congenital health risks in children conceived through assisted reproduction technology (ART): a meeting report.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The Potential Role for Host Genetic Profiling in Screening for Chlamydia-Associated Tubal Factor Infertility (TFI)-New Perspectives.

Authors:  Jelena Malogajski; Ivan Branković; Jolande A Land; Pierre P M Thomas; Servaas A Morré; Elena Ambrosino
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  'Genes versus children': if the goal is parenthood, are we using the optimal approach?

Authors:  Jackson C Kirkman-Brown; Mariana V Martins
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Parenthood aspirations and understanding of factors that affect the chance of achieving them: A population survey.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Renee de Silva
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2021-12-25

Review 6.  Is oocyte donation a risk factor for preeclampsia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Blázquez; Désirée García; Amelia Rodríguez; Rita Vassena; Francesc Figueras; Valérie Vernaeve
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.357

7.  POSEIDON classification and the proposed treatment options for groups 1 and 2: time to revisit? A retrospective analysis of 1425 ART cycles.

Authors:  Parimala Chinta; Belavendra Antonisamy; Ann M Mangalaraj; Aleyamma T Kunjummen; Mohan S Kamath
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.