| Literature DB >> 20646305 |
Mohamad Harajly1, Marie-Therese Khairallah, John E Corkill, George F Araj, Ghassan M Matar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The frequency of transfer of genes encoding resistance to antimicrobial agents was determined by conjugation in ESBL-producing and/or fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates at a tertiary care center in Lebanon. In addition, the role of tra genes encoding transferases in mediating conjugation was assessed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20646305 PMCID: PMC2919444 DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-9-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
MIC (μg/ml) of the antimicrobial agents, ceftazidime (CAZ), cefotaxime (CTX), cefpodoxime (CPD), ciprofloxacin (CIP), gentamicin (GEN) and kanamicin (KAN), and PCR amplification results of the resistance-encoding genes on selected conjugative isolates and their corresponding E. coli J53 (sodium azide-R) transconjugants, in comparison to their RAPD profiles.
| - | - | - | ||||||||
| >256 | >256 | >256 | >32 | 96 | 12 | + | + | + | E-d | |
| 32 | >256 | >256 | 3 | 16 | 6 | + | + | + | ||
| 16 | >256 | >256 | 0.125 | 32 | 12 | + | + | - | E-j | |
| 16 | >256 | >256 | 0.125 | 16 | 8 | + | + | - | ||
| 24 | >256 | >256 | >32 | 1.5 | 16 | + | + | - | E-l | |
| 16 | >256 | >256 | 0.125 | 0.75 | 6 | + | + | - | ||
| 16 | >256 | >256 | >32 | 128 | 32 | + | + | - | E-r | |
| 16 | >256 | >256 | 0.094 | 12 | 8 | + | + | - | ||
| 24 | >256 | >256 | >32 | >256 | 64 | + | + | - | E-l | |
| 16 | >256 | >256 | 0.125 | 16 | 16 | + | + | - | ||
| 24 | >256 | >256 | >32 | 64 | 24 | + | + | - | E-l | |
| 12 | >256 | >256 | 0.125 | 16 | 4 | + | + | - | ||
| 16 | >256 | >256 | 0.094 | 16 | 3 | + | + | - | E-b | |
| 8 | >256 | >256 | 0.047 | 1.5 | 6 | + | + | - | ||
| 24 | >256 | >256 | >32 | 1.5 | 24 | + | + | - | E-q | |
| 24 | >256 | >256 | 0.125 | 1.5 | 4 | + | + | - | ||
| >256 | >256 | >256 | >32 | 128 | 48 | + | + | - | K-e | |
| 32 | >256 | >256 | 0.125 | 16 | 8 | + | + | - | ||
| 32 | >256 | >256 | 0.25 | >256 | 32 | + | + | - | K-o | |
| 16 | >256 | >256 | 0.125 | 12 | 8 | + | + | - | ||
| 96 | >256 | >256 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 4 | + | + | - | K-g | |
| 24 | >256 | >256 | 0.047 | 0.5 | 4 | + | + | - | ||
| 12 | >256 | >256 | 0.047 | 2 | 8 | - | + | - | S-a | |
| 12 | >256 | >256 | 0.047 | 0.5 | 1.5 | - | + | - | ||
| 12 | >256 | >256 | 0.047 | 2 | 8 | - | + | - | S-a | |
| 12 | >256 | >256 | 0.047 | 0.5 | 1.5 | - | + | - | ||
| 12 | >256 | >256 | 0.047 | 2 | 8 | - | + | - | S-a | |
| 12 | >256 | 96 | 0.047 | 0.5 | 1.5 | - | + | - | ||
Figure 1Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles done on the 22 conjugative isolates (parents) and their transconjugants for the antimicrobial agents, ceftazidime (CAZ), cefotaxime (CTX), cefpodoxime (CPD) and ciprofloxacin (CIP).
RAPD profiles of non-conjugative isolates.
| E-e | |
| E-r | |
| E-f | |
| E-r | |
| E-s | |
| E-k | |
| E-q | |
| E-l | |
| E-k | |
| E-m | |
| E-c | |
| E-j | |
| E-d | |
| E-c | |
| E-j | |
| K-o | |
| K-m | |
| K-g | |
| K-g | |
| K-n | |
| K-g | |
| K-g | |
| K-n | |
| K-h | |
Figure 2A Representative RAPD gel on . M: 100 bp ladder. B Representative RAPD gel on K. pneumoniae isolates (RAPD types Ko, Ke, Kg, with corresponding numbers in Tables 1&2)
Figure 3Histogram showing the frequency of conjugative and non-conjugative isolates corresponding to each RAPD profile.