Literature DB >> 20645997

A review of the evidence on the effectiveness of children's vision screening.

M Mathers1, M Keyes, M Wright.   

Abstract

Screening programmes enable health conditions to be identified so that effective interventions can be offered. The aim of this review was to determine: (1) the effectiveness of children's vision screening programmes; (2) at what age children should attend vision screening; and (3) what form vision screening programmes should take to be most effective. A literature review on the effectiveness of vision screening programmes in children aged 0-16 years was undertaken. Eligible studies/reviews were identified through clinical databases, hand searches and consultation with expert reviewers. The methodological quality of papers was rated using National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines. Screening of children 18 months to 5 years, and subsequent early treatment, led to improved visual outcomes. The benefit was primarily through treatment of amblyopia, with improved visual acuity of the amblyopic eye. However, the overall quality of the evidence was low. The implication of improved visual acuity (e.g. any potential impact on quality of life) was not considered. Without consideration of 'quality of life' values, such as loss of vision in one eye or possibility of future bilateral vision loss, the cost-effectiveness of screening is questionable. Screening and treating children with uncorrected refractive error can improve educational outcomes. Evidence suggested that screening occur in the preschool years. Orthoptists were favoured as screening personnel; however, nurses could achieve high sensitivity and specificity with appropriate training. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of neonatal screening. Most studies suggested that children's vision screening was beneficial, although programme components varied widely (e.g. tests used, screening personnel and age at testing). Research is required to clearly define any improvements to quality of life and any related economic benefits resulting from childhood vision screening. The evidence could be used to guide optimization of existing programmes.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20645997     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01109.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Care Health Dev        ISSN: 0305-1862            Impact factor:   2.508


  18 in total

Review 1.  Human visual skills for brain-computer interface use: a tutorial.

Authors:  Melanie Fried-Oken; Michelle Kinsella; Betts Peters; Brandon Eddy; Bruce Wojciechowski
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  Validation of Peek Acuity application in pediatric screening programs in Paraguay.

Authors:  Bryce de Venecia; Yasmin Bradfield; Ralph Møller Trane; Alicia Bareiro; Miguel Scalamogna
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Receipt of Corrective Lenses and Academic Performance of Low-Income Students.

Authors:  Rebecca N Dudovitz; Myung Shin Sim; David Elashoff; Joshua Klarin; Wendelin Slusser; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Parent, Teacher, and Student Perspectives on How Corrective Lenses Improve Child Wellbeing and School Function.

Authors:  Rebecca N Dudovitz; Nilufar Izadpanah; Paul J Chung; Wendelin Slusser
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-05

5.  Preschool vision screening in primary care pediatric practice.

Authors:  Robert W Hered; David L Wood
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school-age children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jennifer R Evans; Priya Morjaria; Christine Powell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-15

7.  Reducing visual deficits caused by refractive errors in school and preschool children: results of a pilot school program in the Andean region of Apurimac, Peru.

Authors:  Sergio Latorre-Arteaga; Diana Gil-González; Olga Enciso; Aoife Phelan; Angel García-Muñoz; Johannes Kohler
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 8.  The status of childhood blindness and functional low vision in the Eastern Mediterranean region in 2012.

Authors:  Rajiv Khandekar; H Kishore; Rabiu M Mansu; Haroon Awan
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

9.  Paediatric vision screening in the primary care setting in Ontario.

Authors:  Tran D Le; Rana Arham Raashid; Linda Colpa; Jason Noble; Asim Ali; Agnes Wong
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Effect of providing free glasses on children's educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiaochen Ma; Zhongqiang Zhou; Hongmei Yi; Xiaopeng Pang; Yaojiang Shi; Qianyun Chen; Mirjam E Meltzer; Saskia le Cessie; Mingguang He; Scott Rozelle; Yizhi Liu; Nathan Congdon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.