Literature DB >> 20645948

Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel.

L Gasteiger1, J Brimacombe, D Perkhofer, M Kaufmann, C Keller.   

Abstract

In a randomised, non-crossover study, we tested the hypothesis that the ease of insertion using a duodenal tube guided insertion technique and the oropharyngeal leak pressure differ between the LMA ProSeal and the i-gel in non-paralysed, anesthetised female subjects. One hundred and fifty-two females aged 19-70 years were studied. Insertion success rate, insertion time and oropharyngeal leak pressure were measured. First attempt and overall insertion success were similar (LMA ProSeal, 75/76 (99%) and 76/76 (100%); i-gel 73/75 (97%) and 75 (100%), respectively). Mean (SD) insertion times were similar (LMA ProSeal, 40 (16) s; i-gel 43 (21) s). Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure was 7 cmH(2) O higher with the LMA ProSeal (p < 0.0001). Insertion of the LMA ProSeal and i-gel is similarly easy using a duodenal tube guided technique, but the LMA ProSeal forms a more effective seal for ventilation.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20645948     DOI： 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06422.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN： 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  9 in total

1.  Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?

Authors:  Massimiliano Sorbello; Flavia Petrini
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Haemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery.

Authors:  Gökhan Peker; Suna Akın Takmaz; Bülent Baltacı; Hülya Başar; Mustafa Kotanoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-08-21

3.  I-gel versus laryngeal mask airway-Proseal: Comparison of two supraglottic airway devices in short surgical procedures.

Authors:  Poonam A Jadhav; Naina P Dalvi; Bharati A Tendolkar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sun Kyung Park; Geun Joo Choi; Yun Suk Choi; Eun Jin Ahn; Hyun Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A randomised controlled trial comparing ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, i-gel and Laryngeal Tube Suction-D under general anaesthesia for elective surgical patients requiring controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Bikramjit Das; Rahul Varshney; Subhro Mitra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-12

6.  Comparative evaluation of Ambu AuraGain™ with ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kriti Singh; Pavan Gurha
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-06

7.  Comparison of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Following Digital Insertion in Nonparalyzed Anesthetized Patients.

Authors:  Ankur Luthra; Rajeev Chauhan; Amit Jain; Ishwar Bhukal; Shalvi Mahajan; Indu Bala
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2019-12-16

8.  Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults.

Authors:  C Frerk; V S Mitchell; A F McNarry; C Mendonca; R Bhagrath; A Patel; E P O'Sullivan; N M Woodall; I Ahmad
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 9.  Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of LMA ProSeal™ and i-gel® in adults: Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Hye Won Shin; Hae Na Yoo; Go Eun Bae; Jun Chul Chang; Min Kyung Park; Hae Seun You; Hyun Jung Kim; Hyung Sik Ahn
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 1.671
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.