Literature DB >> 20645299

Shape and size effects in π-π interactions: face-to-face dimers.

Chaoyang Zhang1.   

Abstract

The shape and size effects in π–π interactions of face-to-face dimers are discussed, by taking three typical groups of π-systems with different shapes (wave-linear, WL; ladder-shaped, LS; and regular-hexagonal, RH) and sizes (2 to 216 π-electrons) as samples, and carrying out a series of static scanning forcefield calculations. These effects are: (1) for differently shaped π-systems with a same quantity of π-electrons, the denser π-electrons lead to the stronger π–π interactions; (2) the interaction orientation, such as the interplanar distance, is controlled by not only van der Waals (vdW) but also electrostatic potential, even though the former is much stronger and has more contributions to total interaction energy than the latter. Furthermore, these interplanar distances are in a range determined by only monomer shapes, i.e., 3.6–4.1 Å for WL, 3.5–3.7 Å for LS, and 3.4–3.7 Å for RH; (3) a centroid-centroid distance corresponding to the global lowest vdW potential point of a dimer with two identical monomers is only determined by the monomer shape, i.e., 3.6, 3.5, and 3.4 Å, for WL, LS, and RH, respectively; (4) rotation will change the interaction energy when both two monomers with big sizes and low symmetries, and vice versa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20645299     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  2 in total

1.  How strong is the edge effect in the adsorption of anticancer drugs on a graphene cluster?

Authors:  Chompoonut Rungnim; Rungroj Chanajaree; Thanyada Rungrotmongkol; Supot Hannongbua; Nawee Kungwan; Peter Wolschann; Alfred Karpfen; Vudhichai Parasuk
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Why is the crystal shape of TATB is so similar to its molecular shape? Understanding by only its root molecule.

Authors:  Chaoyang Zhang; Bin Kang; Xia Cao; Bin Xiang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.810

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.