BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a clinically significant disorder in adulthood, but current diagnostic criteria and instruments do not seem to adequately capture the complexity of the disorder in this developmental phase. Accordingly, there are limited data on the proportion of adults affected by the disorder, specially in developing countries. METHOD: We assessed a representative household sample of the Brazilian population for ADHD with the Adult ADHD Self-report Scale (ASRS) Screener, and evaluated the instrument according to the Rasch model of item response theory. RESULTS: The sample was comprised by 3007 individuals, and the overal prevalence of positive screeners for ADHD was 5.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8-7.0]. Rasch analyses revealed the misfitt of the overall sample to expectations of the model. The evaluation of the sample stratified by age revealed that data for adolescents showed a signficant fittnes to the model expectations, while items completed by adults were not adequated. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of fitness to the model for adult respondents challenges the possibility of a linear transformation of the ordinal data into interval measures and the utilization of parametric analyses of data. This result suggests that diagnostic criteria and instruments for adult ADHD must take into account a developmental perspective. Moreover, it calls for further evaluation of currently employed research methods in light of modern theories of psychometrics.
BACKGROUND:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a clinically significant disorder in adulthood, but current diagnostic criteria and instruments do not seem to adequately capture the complexity of the disorder in this developmental phase. Accordingly, there are limited data on the proportion of adults affected by the disorder, specially in developing countries. METHOD: We assessed a representative household sample of the Brazilian population for ADHD with the Adult ADHD Self-report Scale (ASRS) Screener, and evaluated the instrument according to the Rasch model of item response theory. RESULTS: The sample was comprised by 3007 individuals, and the overal prevalence of positive screeners for ADHD was 5.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8-7.0]. Rasch analyses revealed the misfitt of the overall sample to expectations of the model. The evaluation of the sample stratified by age revealed that data for adolescents showed a signficant fittnes to the model expectations, while items completed by adults were not adequated. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of fitness to the model for adult respondents challenges the possibility of a linear transformation of the ordinal data into interval measures and the utilization of parametric analyses of data. This result suggests that diagnostic criteria and instruments for adult ADHD must take into account a developmental perspective. Moreover, it calls for further evaluation of currently employed research methods in light of modern theories of psychometrics.
Authors: Guilherme Polanczyk; Maurício Silva de Lima; Bernardo Lessa Horta; Joseph Biederman; Luis Augusto Rohde Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Lenard A Adler; Michael J Gruber; Chaitanya A Sarawate; Thomas Spencer; David L Van Brunt Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2007 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Christie A Hartman; Heather Gelhorn; Thomas J Crowley; Joseph T Sakai; Michael Stallings; Susan E Young; Soo Hyun Rhee; Robin Corley; John K Hewitt; Christian J Hopfer Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Lenard Adler; Minnie Ames; Olga Demler; Steve Faraone; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Robert Jin; Kristina Secnik; Thomas Spencer; T Bedirhan Ustun; Ellen E Walters Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: J Fayyad; R De Graaf; R Kessler; J Alonso; M Angermeyer; K Demyttenaere; G De Girolamo; J M Haro; E G Karam; C Lara; J-P Lépine; J Ormel; J Posada-Villa; A M Zaslavsky; R Jin Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Alan Tennant; Massimo Penta; Luigi Tesio; Gunnar Grimby; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Anita Slade; Gemma Lawton; Anna Simone; Jane Carter; Asa Lundgren-Nilsson; Maria Tripolski; Haim Ring; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Crt Marincek; Helena Burger; Suzanne Phillips Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Alexandra Garcia Rosales; Silia Vitoratou; Tobias Banaschewski; Philip Asherson; Jan Buitelaar; Robert D Oades; Aribert Rothenberger; Hans-Christoph Steinhausen; Stephen V Faraone; Wai Chen Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Tiffany M Chaim; Tianhao Zhang; Marcus V Zanetti; Maria Aparecida da Silva; Mário R Louzã; Jimit Doshi; Mauricio H Serpa; Fabio L S Duran; Sheila C Caetano; Christos Davatzikos; Geraldo F Busatto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John Fayyad; Nancy A Sampson; Irving Hwang; Tomasz Adamowski; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Ali Al-Hamzawi; Laura H S G Andrade; Guilherme Borges; Giovanni de Girolamo; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Chiyi Hu; Elie G Karam; Sing Lee; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Siobhan O'Neill; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Marina Piazza; José Posada-Villa; Margreet Ten Have; Yolanda Torres; Miguel Xavier; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Atten Defic Hyperact Disord Date: 2016-11-19
Authors: Victor B Arias; Daniel E Nuñez; Agustín Martínez-Molina; Fernando P Ponce; Benito Arias Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ole Jakob Storebø; Erica Ramstad; Helle B Krogh; Trine Danvad Nilausen; Maria Skoog; Mathilde Holmskov; Susanne Rosendal; Camilla Groth; Frederik L Magnusson; Carlos R Moreira-Maia; Donna Gillies; Kirsten Buch Rasmussen; Dorothy Gauci; Morris Zwi; Richard Kirubakaran; Bente Forsbøl; Erik Simonsen; Christian Gluud Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-11-25
Authors: Daniel Fatori; Pedro Fonseca Zuccolo; Elizabeth Shephard; Helena Brentani; Alicia Matijasevich; Alexandre Archanjo Ferraro; Lislaine Aparecida Fracolli; Anna Maria Chiesa; James Leckman; Euripedes Constantino Miguel; Guilherme V Polanczyk Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 4.379