Literature DB >> 20645114

The postpartum depression screening scale: is it valid to screen for antenatal depression?

Ana Telma Pereira1, Sandra C Bos, Mariana Marques, Berta R Maia, Maria João Soares, José Valente, Ana Allen Gomes, António Macedo, Maria Helena Pinto de Azevedo.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to analyse for the first time the validity of a slightly modified version of the Portuguese Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS), to be used as a screening instrument for antenatal depression. Specifically, the aims were to analyse its psychometric properties, to determine PDSS cutoff points and associated conditional probabilities to screen for depression according to DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria and to compare its screening performance with that of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Five hundred and three pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy completed both questionnaires and were interviewed face-to-face with the Portuguese version of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. The Portuguese version of the Operational Criteria Checklist for Psychotic Illness was used to obtain DSM-IV and ICD-10 diagnoses of depression, our gold standards for caseness. PDSS reliability and validity were very good and comparable to those obtained in the postpartum validation studies developed in Portugal and in other countries, showing satisfactory sensitivity and specificity combinations (≅80%). Compared with BDI-II, it has the advantage of being more specific for the motherhood context. Although developed for postpartum depression, PDSS is accurate to screen for antenatal depression, and it could be very useful for clinical and epidemiologic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20645114     DOI: 10.1007/s00737-010-0178-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health        ISSN: 1434-1816            Impact factor:   3.633


  6 in total

Review 1.  Childbearing depression and childhood aggression: literature review.

Authors:  Katherine Hendricks; Jianghong Liu
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.412

2.  Racial differences in the prevalence of antenatal depression.

Authors:  Amelia R Gavin; Jennifer L Melville; Tessa Rue; Yuqing Guo; Karen Tabb Dina; Wayne J Katon
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.238

3.  The magnitude and determinants of depressive symptoms amongst women in early pregnancy in Southern Nigeria: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Omolola F Oboro; Vincent Ebulue; Victor O Oboro; Victor Ohenhen; Adeoye Oyewole; Rasaq Akindele; Olufemi Ala; Olaolu Oyeniran; Adegboye Isawumi; Babatunde Afolabi
Journal:  S Afr J Psychiatr       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 1.242

4.  Are women with major depression in pregnancy identifiable in population health data?

Authors:  Lyn Colvin; Linda Slack-Smith; Fiona J Stanley; Carol Bower
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Assessment of depression in medical patients: a systematic review of the utility of the Beck Depression Inventory-II.

Authors:  Yuan-Pang Wang; Clarice Gorenstein
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Antenatal depression and its potential causal mechanisms among pregnant mothers in Gondar town: application of structural equation model.

Authors:  Abel Fekadu Dadi; Emma R Miller; Richard Woodman; Telake Azale Bisetegn; Lillian Mwanri
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.