Literature DB >> 20645013

Mucinous gastric cancer presents with more advanced tumor stage and weaker β-catenin expression than nonmucinous cancer.

Min-Gew Choi1, Chang Ohk Sung, Jae Hyung Noh, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Sung Kim, Jae Moon Bae.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mucinous gastric carcinoma (MGC) is a rare type of gastric cancer; its biological behavior is controversial. In this study, we attempted to clarify the clinical and pathological features as well as the prognostic significance of MGC. We also compared the expression patterns of CDX-2 and β-catenin between MGC and nonmucinous gastric carcinoma (NMGC).
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 9218 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastric cancer surgery between January 1997 and December 2006. The clinicopathological features and clinical outcome of MGC (n = 197) were compared to NMGC (n = 9021). Immunohistochemical staining using the tissue array method was performed on MGC (n = 194) and NMGC (n = 89) tissues.
RESULTS: MGC had a larger size and a higher frequency of Borrmann type I findings in advanced cases than NMGC. In addition, MGC had deeper invasion, more lymph node and lymphatic involvement, a more advanced tumor stage, and lower 5-year survival rates than NMGC. Age, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and curability were independent prognostic factors; but the mucinous histological type itself was not predictive of outcome. β-Catenin immunoreactivity was statistically significantly weaker in MGC than NMGC; however, there was no difference in CDX-2 expression between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: MGC presents at a more advanced stage and was larger than NMGC. The poor prognosis of MGC was related to the more advanced tumor stage at diagnosis; the histological type was not an independent prognostic factor. The result of immunohistochemical staining suggests that MGC has a distinct pathway of carcinogenesis from NMGC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20645013     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1184-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  8 in total

1.  Histotype-based prognostic classification of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Anna Maria Chiaravalli; Catherine Klersy; Alessandro Vanoli; Andrea Ferretti; Carlo Capella; Enrico Solcia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinicopathologic features and prognosis analysis of mucinous gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Chunming Yin; Deming Li; Zhe Sun; Ting Zhang; Yan Xu; Zhenning Wang; Huimian Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jae Eun Lee; Yoon Young Choi; Ji Yeong An; Ki Tae Kim; Su-Jin Shin; Jae-Ho Cheong
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 7.701

Review 4.  Biomarkers for predicting future metastasis of human gastrointestinal tumors.

Authors:  Lui Ng; Ronnie Tung Ping Poon; Roberta Pang
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Prognosis of early mucinous gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Seong Yeob Ryu; Ho Gun Kim; Jae Hyuk Lee; Dong Yi Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.859

6.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma: differing clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography features in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jianxi Zhao; Gang Ren; Rong Cai; Jian Chen; Huali Li; Chen Guo; Wenguang He; Xiangru Wu; Wenjie Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

7.  Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in stage I-III mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study at a single medical center.

Authors:  Jun-Te Hsu; Chen-Wei Wang; Puo-Hsien Le; Ren-Chin Wu; Tsung-Hsing Chen; Kun-Chun Chiang; Chun-Jung Lin; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Gastric Mucinous Cancer Histology: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Value.

Authors:  Chen Jian-Hui; Cai Shi-Rong; Wu Hui; Xu Jian-Bo; Wu Kai-Ming; Chen Si-le; Yu-Long He
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.